After 755 days of defending rights, Tesla Model S owner Han Chao finally won the lawsuit. Tesla sales fraud was established. The appeal was rejected and one compensation was paid. Earlier, because it was discovered after a major accident car was sold by Tesla, the rights defender Han Chao directly took Tesla to court.In the first instance, Tesla was sentenced to “return one and pay three” and had to pay more than one million yuan to Han Chao.
access:
Baidu network disk joint members buy 1 get 5: QQ music, Youku video…
Tesla refused to accept the appeal, and now, the second-instance judgment: dismissed Tesla’s appeal and upheld the original verdict!
According to Han Chao, his rights protection experience originated from the purchase of a second-hand Tesla accident car, which he purchased on Tesla’s official website to purchase Tesla’s official P85 Model S sedan.
Before the purchase, the sales informed the Tesla certified vehicle that there were no major accidents, blisters, fire, or structural damage, but after inspection, the C-pillar and rear fender of the vehicle were cut and welded.
Since defending his rights in August 19, he has finally won the case in the first instance. According to the civil judgment of the People’s Court of Daxing District, Beijing, Tesla was sentenced to pay one compensation to three in the first instance.
In response to this result, Tesla China officially responded that,Although the C-pillar is cut on the vehicle sold by Tesla, it is not a major accident vehicle due to the maintenance process, so an appeal will be filed.
Han Chao said that even though the third-party appraisal agency certified by the court department stated that the vehicle is already a major accident vehicle, Tesla still insists on being “stubborn.”
Moreover, in the process of defending rights, over a year of contact with Tesla, Tesla’s response to him has been particularly negative. For example, if you go to negotiate a vehicle issue, he will tell you to wait for the superior communication email or something. But after waiting for a few months, they never did anything.
In addition, Tesla’s response to the vehicles that have cut the C-pillar is as bold as ever.They (Tesla) feel that there is no problem with the vehicle. If the vehicle is returned, the vehicle will mainly bear the loss of 100,000 yuan.
Even if the court has put the certification of the “accident car” before it, Tesla still feels that there is no problem. Think of it as a repair of the exterior parts of their aluminum car body.
Today, the results of the second trial have come out. Tesla was found to be a sales fraud and was sentenced to return one compensation three. In addition to losing money, does Tesla still owe the owner Han Chao an apology?
.