ROMA – There is a 110% Superbonus clash for building renovations. On the one hand, the government, following indications from Brussels, threatens to reduce the figure of 18 billion in three years by 8 billion net, leaving citizens and apartment buildings dry-mouthed ready to renovate their homes according to ecological and green criteria.
On the other hand, the Pd and M5S which, in view of the closure of the Recovery file, are making a wall. “There will be a de facto blockade in the construction sector caused by two reasons”, declares Martina Nardi, president of the Productive Activities Commission. “The time frame is too short to start and finish the works, given that without resources or with scarce resources, 110% will not be extended until the end of 2023”.
Secondly, continues Nardi, “a negative message is given to families who are now deciding whether or not to renovate their homes and to construction companies that have to invest. For example, it is already evident that it is difficult to find scaffolding in the necessary quantities and times” .
SUPERBONUS BUILDING: THE SPECIAL WITH QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
M5S and Pd therefore threaten a battle against the Treasury to change this approach and return to the political pact already signed in Conte 2 which provided for the inclusion of the 110% Superbonus in the Pnrr so as to lengthen the timing for at least another 2 years. In the tables in circulation that anticipate the NRP, the Superbonus loan is split between 10 billion from European funds and 8 billion integrated by the national fund (which has a total endowment of 30 billion).
On the tax relief – which is triggered when ‘important’ works are carried out on the buildings (the so-called coat or the replacement of the heating system) in order to earn two energy classes, or structural anti-seismic interventions – await an extension at least until the end of 2023. A horizon considered essential to start complex works, whose times have been extended due to the succession of technical indications which, between implementation measures and indications of the Revenue Agency, only at the end of 2020 clarified the picture. On the other hand, there is still the need to introduce simplifications, in particular as regards the presence of building abuses. Among the hypotheses under study, there is also an expansion of the Superbonus to hotels and accommodation facilities: the tourism sector awaits it as an incentive to improve infrastructure and, in a broad sense, to restart after the blow of the forced closures due to Covid .
The same construction chain, from companies to the network of technical professions up to condominium administrators, jointly requested “reassurances from the Government on the extension of the 110% tax deduction for energy efficiency interventions and seismic safety of buildings”, ” clearing the field of the hypotheses circulated in the last days of downsizing the measure “. In a unitary note of ten acronyms it is explained: “The interventions of the Superbonus 110% are finally starting to start, for this reason it is necessary to give certainty to the measure and avoid sudden braking”.
The “serious mistake” speaks of Confindustria: “Instead of once again allocating huge resources to Alitalia, the Government should focus on industry, the only one to have reacted to the blows of the crisis and which continues to support the country”, says Emanuele Orsini, Vice President of Confindustria for credit, finance and the tax authorities arguing over the non-extension of the superbonus. “The Superbonus 110% is a measure that, with the modernization of the country’s real estate assets, allows for the achievement of the ecological transition objectives envisaged by the NRP”, says Orsini.
.