Home » The jurist Simoncini on the fantastic in Meta: “More incisive monetary penalties are wanted”

The jurist Simoncini on the fantastic in Meta: “More incisive monetary penalties are wanted”

by admin
The jurist Simoncini on the fantastic in Meta: “More incisive monetary penalties are wanted”

Andrea Simoncini, full professor of Constitutional Law on the University of Florence. A fantastic of three.5 million euros to Meta, which capitalizes 1209 billion {dollars} on the inventory market. Will or not it’s of any use?
«It’s as if we paid a penny for a parking ban. The difficulty of the incisiveness of sanctions exists and Parliament ought to take cost of it. The Antitrust, which applies the legislation, is to not blame if it has blunt weapons. If something, immediately it needs to be praised.”

Why?
«Before even arriving on the fantastic, the Antitrust pressured Meta to revive right and legit conduct. It is affirmation that the assure authorities have a decisive position: the Antitrust, AgCom itself. We should not bow to the overwhelming power of those platforms and the motion of the authorities helps us, comforts us.”

For the identical “parking ban”, for the violation of information use, Facebook was already fined in 2018.
«Our knowledge, the Antitrust reiterates immediately, are the central useful resource on which Meta bases its enterprise mannequin. Let’s not be stunned then if Facebook and Instagram attempt to extract the utmost worth from that genuine gold mine of private knowledge. Let’s not be stunned if the Antitrust has taken motion a number of occasions. And in 2018 with specific incisiveness.”

The 2018 investigation pressured Facebook to delete the phrases: Sign up from its dwelling web page. It’s free and all the time can be. He wasn’t telling the reality

The fantastic then was 10 million.
“That’s not the purpose. The 2018 investigation pressured Facebook to delete the phrases: Sign up from its dwelling web page. It’s free and all the time can be. A writing that was not telling the reality as a result of we pay a worth to make use of social media: we’re pressured to present them our most intimate knowledge. Everyone, at each second.”

See also  Professional transport of goods - cargo bikes instead of delivery vans: cargo bikes conquer the cities - News

We give them away and are usually not absolutely knowledgeable.
«This is ascertained by the Antitrust, first in 2018 and once more now, in 2024. The circle closes».

When a social community has billions of profiles, closing the profile just isn’t determined by a human. Control of the submit is delegated to a robotic

Today Meta can be sanctioned as a result of it closed your profile, maybe by mistake, with out you with the ability to defend your self as greatest you could possibly.
«When a social community has billions of profiles, as within the case of Instagram and Facebook, it’s clear that closing the profile just isn’t determined by a human. The management of the submit is delegated to a robotic, which implements it routinely. It’s an issue of scale, of dimensions. And right here too the Antitrust intervenes with readability.”

Meanwhile, she poses the issue that she herself raises: the robots resolve right here.
“Exact. The Antitrust additionally managed to extend to 180 days, from the unique 30, the deadline inside which a good particular person, a good firm can contest the closure of the profile towards Meta, with a completely inside process. Another nice success”

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Privacy & Cookies Policy