Home » Amanda Knox, Lumumba’s slander conviction upheld

Amanda Knox, Lumumba’s slander conviction upheld

by admin

For Amanda Knox, this three-year sentence was confirmed – she was already incarcerated for any crime – for slandering Patrick Lumumba within the early phases of the investigation into the homicide of Meredith Kercher, involving him in a case for which he was later dismissed. was discovered to be utterly non-inclusive.

This was determined by the Court of Appeal of Florence after a short deliberation.

Knox attended the sentencing studying along with her husband and protection attorneys by her aspect.

“Amanda Knox isn’t a sufferer, however a slanderer.” These are the phrases Patrick Lumumba’s lawyer, Carlo Pacelli, commented to ANSA in regards to the sentence learn on the finish of the quick interview. Lumumba didn’t attend the listening to, being busy in Perugia with work.

The difficulty

Amanda Knox arrived on the Florence court docket this morning, alongside along with her husband Chris Robinson. Upon his arrival, he didn’t say something to the reporters, however he spoke spontaneously in court docket: “I’d not be the witness they needed for Patrick. I didn’t know who the killer (of Meredith Kercher – ed.) was.”

The American, talking in Italian and holding a pamphlet in his hand, adopted the hours he spent on the Perugia police station the place he was arrested for the homicide of Meredith Kercher the place he had all the time declared himself to be a stranger and had completed it for him. you’re freed in any respect.

“I used to be drained, confused, compelled to ship,” he added. “I went secretly to refresh my thoughts,” he added, referring to a notice written in English given to the inspector earlier than he was taken to jail. He then defined that he advised the investigators that he wouldn’t repeat in court docket what was mentioned that evening (the questions have been then declared unusable).

See also  People and authorities: united in confusion

“But they have been busy arresting an harmless man and saying in entrance of the cameras that the case is closed,” he emphasised. “I requested for a paper – he continued – and I wrote that doc. The goal was to withdraw. I wasn’t mendacity however I needed to know if the complicated pictures I had in my head have been true”.

Knox described the evening earlier than the arrest as “the worst in my life. “A number of days in the past – he remembered – we had discovered my buddy, the sufferer of a horrible crime, in his home. I used to be scared, drained, homeless and away from my household. I’ve by no means been so weak.”

In the automated assertion he targeted on the hours on the police station. “They known as me a liar – he mentioned – and refused to imagine me. They advised me that there was proof linking me to this case. I attempted to recollect what I could not bear in mind.”

In the gang of photographers and videographers who have been current on the door of the court docket, Amanda Knox was hit on the top with a digital camera, affected by a small bump, “nothing critical” confirmed one among her defenders, Luca Luparia Donati.

Today’s trial befell after the Supreme Court – utilizing the choice of the European Court of Human Rights – dismissed the three-year sentence, suspending the trial to evaluate the potential for a defamation case solely in relation to the memoir written by the Americans on the morning of November 6, 2007.

See also  Quarantine from Gb, Pregliasco: "Weighing unknown Delta variant"

Lumumba is a public determine within the case: his lawyer, Carlo Pacelli, requested for affirmation of Knox’s legal responsibility for defamation.

Read the complete article on ANSA.it

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Privacy & Cookies Policy