Home » Please witness 5.5GHz! Intel Core i9-12900KS test report / remake the strongest gaming processor

Please witness 5.5GHz! Intel Core i9-12900KS test report / remake the strongest gaming processor

by admin
Please witness 5.5GHz! Intel Core i9-12900KS test report / remake the strongest gaming processor

Intel once again dominates the throne of the strongest gaming processor, the new Intel Core i9-12900KS processor, with a natural and specially selected physique, reaches the ultra-high Turbo clock of all-core P-core 5.2GHz and dual-core 5.5GHz, and has Intel Adaptive Boost and Thermal Velocity Boost overclocking function, Taiwan’s recommended price of $22,888 flagship price, compared to the standard i9-12900K how much performance improvement!

Intel Core i9-12900KS special dual-core 5.5GHz, P-core all-core 5.2GHz

Intel Core i9-12900KS has the same hardware specifications as i9-12900K. It adopts Intel 7 process processor with a hybrid architecture of 8 performance cores P-core and 8 efficiency cores E-core, with 16 cores, 24 threads, 14MB L2 Cache, 30MB L3 cache, and UHD Graphics 770 internal display.


↑ The Intel Core i9-12900KS commercial version is marked as Special Edition.

The difference between the two is that the i9-12900KS has the highest dual-core 5.5GHz Turbo, all-core P-core 5.2GHz, E-core 4.0GHz high clock, and overclocking functions such as Intel Adaptive Boost (ABT) and Thermal Velocity Boost (TVB). However, the basic power consumption of the relative processor is increased to 150W, and the maximum Turbo power consumption is 241W.

However, the Thermal Velocity Boost temperature is limited to 50°C. In other words, in order to enable TVB to start up to a dual-core 5.5GHz Turbo clock, it needs to be matched with 280 / 360mm AIO water cooling. Otherwise, it will be based on ABT’s full-core overclocking. .


↑ Wafer box inside the package.


↑ Intel Core i9-12900KS processor.

Test platform and set i9-12900KS to enable ABT and TVB functions

In this test, Intel Core i9-12900KS and i9-12900K are the main and rival Ryzen 9 5950X, but the main focus is on the performance improvement of i9-12900KS, and whether it can become the strongest game processor again in 1080p game performance .

Overclocking functions such as Adaptive Boost (ABT) and Thermal Velocity Boost (TVB) are enabled by default on the i9-12900KS, and the power consumption limit is disabled by default on the board, allowing players to have the most complete performance experience; but the i9-12900K does not These two overclocking functions are supported, so only the Auto test is performed, but the 5950X has the PBO overclocking function turned on.


↑ ABT on.


↑ TVB is on.

testing platform
Processor: Intel Core i9-12900KS, i9-12900K
Motherboard: ASUS ROG MAXIMUS Z690 HERO 1304
Memory: CORSAIR DOMINATOR PLATINUM RGB DDR5 32GBx2 5200MHz
Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
System Disk: Samsung NVMe SSD 960 PRO M.2
Radiator: ASUS ROG STRIX LC II 280mm
Power supply: be quiet! DARK POWER 12 750W
Operating system: Windows 11 Pro 21H2

Processor: AMD Ryzen 5950X
Motherboard: ASUS ROG Crosshair VIII Dark Hero 4006
Memory: Micron DDR4 32GBx2 3200MHz
Operating system: Windows 11 Pro 21H2

CPU-Z processor performance Cinebench, VRay rendering test

CPU-Z View Intel Core i9-12900KS processor information, Intel 7 process processor codenamed Alder Lake, core is 8 P + 8 E, 24 threads, with ROG MAXIMUS Z690 HERO motherboard, BIOS 1304 version, memory is dual channel 64GB 5200MHz.


↑ CPU-Z。

First of all, in the CPU performance test of CPU-Z, the i9-12900KS scored 12277.5 points and 872.1 points in a single thread in the multi-thread test. Compared with the i9-12900K, the performance of the i9-12900KS increased by 7.4% in multi-thread and single-thread. 5.8% performance improvement; compared with 5950X, it is 33% single thread lead and -2.3% small loss multi thread performance.


↑ CPU-Z, the higher the performance, the better.

CINEBENCH R20developed by MAXON based on Cinema 4D, can be used to evaluate the 3D rendering performance of computer processors.

The i9-12900KS scored 11053 PTS in the multi-core test and 802 PTS in the single-core test. Compared with the i9-12900K, it was 4.4% higher than the i9-12900K in the multi-core test and 4% ahead of the single-core test. % grades.


↑ CINEBENCH R20, the higher the better.

CINEBENCH R23 The same as the R20 test scenario, it uses a new compiler and has a stress test function. Players can customize the Minimum Test Duration time, such as 10 or 30 minutes to test the stability of the computer; however, the results of R23 cannot be compared with R20.

The i9-12900KS multi-core achieves 29061 PTS and single-core 2149 PTS, which is 4.9% ahead of the i9-12900K in multi-core and 6.2% in single-core performance, and outperforms the 5950X multi-core by 3.1% and single-core by 35.4%.


↑ CINEBENCH R23, the higher the better.

Corona Benchmark It is a relatively easy-to-operate test tool. Corona Renderer 1.3 is used for testing, and the rendering speed of the processor is compared with the performance of Rays/s. The score is measured in seconds.

See also  decisive hours for the farewell to Rome

The i9-12900KS finished rendering in 52 seconds, slightly faster than the i9-12900K’s 54 seconds, but this project was no match for the 16C24T’s 5950X, which completed the job in just 45 seconds.


↑ Corona Benchmark, the less time the better.

V-Ray Benchmark Developed by Chaos Group, V-Ray is a ray rendering software designed based on the laws of physics, and this tool can perform computational performance test of ray-traced rendered images for CPU. The CPU score is calculated in vsamples per second.

The i9-12900KS achieved a computing power of 19,672 and beat the i9-12900K, but also lost to the 5950X’s score of 21,547 points.


↑ V-Ray Benchmark, the sooner the better.

POV-Ray It is another set of free ray tracing 3D rendering tools, which uses the computing power of multi-core CPU to calculate the rendering of light and shadow and 3D images.

The i9-12900KS won the championship with 9538.75 PPS, beating the i9-12900K’s 9099.06 PPS and the 5950X’s 9390.46 PPS.


↑ POV-Ray, the higher the better.

Blender It is a cross-platform, open source 3D authoring tool that supports various 3D operations: Modeling, Rigging, Animation, Simulation, Rendering, Compositing and Motion Tracking. For the test, use Blender Benchmark 3.1.0 to test the rendering work of the Demo project.

The test result is the number of samples per minute, and the higher the performance, the better. It can be seen that the 16 cores of the 5950X are still relatively strong, but the i9-12900KS is closely behind.


↑ Blender, the higher the performance, the better.

Creative PR image output, LR and PS photo editing performance test

For the conversion output test of Adobe Premiere Pro 2020, this time using UL Procyon Video Editing Benchmark Test tool, the test scenario is to use 2160p 30/60 FPS video, output H.264 – YouTube 1080p Full HD and HEVC (H.265) – 4K UHD format, and compare the output performance of pure CPU output and adding GPU acceleration .

In the case of using the same RTX 3080 Ti graphics card, this result can clearly reflect the performance of different CPUs for audio and video conversion output, but the mainstream audio and video output is mainly based on the mixed operation of CPU + GPU.

In terms of performance, the i9-12900KS achieves 10491 points and the i9-12900K’s 10233 points are quite close, but the 5950X’s score is relatively far behind.


↑ UL Procyon Video Editing Benchmark, the higher the score, the better.

Adobe Photoshop and Lightroom Classic through UL Procyon Photo Editing Benchmark Test tool; the two working scenarios of the test, Image Retouching test is to use Photoshop to trim photos and record the time of each step, while Batch Processing test is to use Lightroom to adjust and output a large number of photos in batches.

From the overall score, the i9-12900KS won the championship with 11159 points, and all performances are ahead of the i9-12900K and 5950X, whether it is image editing or batch photo processing and other functions. .


↑ UL Procyon Photo Editing Benchmark, the higher the score, the better.

AIDA64 processor memory, 7-Zip compression test

AIDA64 memoryIn the test, i9-12900KS and i9-12900K use CORSAIR DOMINATOR PLATINUM RGB DDR5 32GBx2 5200MHz memory, which can achieve high performance of reading 81691 MB/s and writing 77282 MB/s; compared to the DDR4 platform, Micron DDR4 32GBx2 3200MHz memory is used .

In terms of memory bandwidth alone, it can be found that the gap between DDR5 and DDR4 is nearly 2X times, but the actual performance varies depending on whether the application is heavy on memory bandwidth.


↑ Memory performance test.

Compared with the current DDR5 high clock, the memory timing is relatively loose, and the DR4 memory has better timing. The tested CORSAIR DDR5 timing is CL38, and the i9-12900KS memory delay is 72.4ns.


↑ Memory latency.

WinRAR Extensive and convenient compression software, supporting a lot of compressed files and formats, this one used to prefer high clock in performance, but in the Alder Lake generation, Ryzen has an advantage in performance.

The i9-12900KS achieves a performance of 38698 KB/s, but has a higher performance of 46489 KB/s than the 5950X.


↑ WinRAR, the higher the performance, the better.

7-Zip The compression test prefers multi-core performance, so the 5950X is still relatively strong in this project. As for the i9-12900KS, the performance reaches 135.3 GIPS in compression and 154.2 GIPS in decompression.

See also  Massacre of Bologna, the spokesman of the Lazio Region on Facebook sides with the definitively sentenced Mambro, Ciavardini and Fioravanti: "Institutional offices are lying"


↑ 7-Zip, the higher the performance, the better.

PCMark 10, CrossMark and Office PC benchmarks

The overall performance of the computer is PCMark 10 For the test, you can score the basic computer work of Essentials, such as app startup speed, video conferencing, and web browsing performance, while the Productivity productivity test uses spreadsheets and paperwork as test items. As for Digital Content Creation, video content creation, Tests are based on photo/video editing, rendering and visualization.

The i9-12900KS achieves a high score of 9480 points in total, 11884 points in basic computer work, 11506 points in productivity, and 16906 points in creation; i9-12900KS and i9-12900K have comparable results but better than the 5950X computer performance.


↑ PCMark 10, higher scores are better.

CrossMark The cross-platform computer performance testing tool is a free testing tool developed by BAPCo. It supports platforms such as Windows, iOS/iPadOS, macOS, and Android, and is aimed at computer productivity, such as text editing, spreadsheets, web browsing, and authoring. Class photo editing, organizing and video editing work, plus the computer response speed to test.

The i9-12900KS scored 2366 points in total, 2126 points in productivity, 2765 points in creation and 2043 points in response, and easily beat the i9-12900K and 5950X under the improved clock.


↑ CrossMark, the higher the score, the better.

UL Procyon Office Productivity Benchmark uses Microsoft Word, Excel, PowerPoint and Outlook to test the practical and real performance of Windows computers in daily work, and design test scenarios with common paperwork, from document opening, copying, input, spreadsheets Calculation, sorting, exporting, adding files, pictures, videos and emails to and from presentations, etc.

In the test, the i9-12900KS scored 8716 points, Word 9293 points, Excel 9512 points, PowerPoint 8952 points, Outlook 6107 points; overall, the performance of these three processors in the use of Office is definitely not a problem, but in comparison There are still highs and lows.


↑ UL Procyon Office, the higher the score, the better.

3DMark CPU performance and FS, TS benchmarks

Computer graphics game performance test tool 3DMarkthe mainstream Direct X11 test Fire Strike and Direct X12 Time Spy test.

Judging from the running score, the i9-12900KS scored a total score of 41877 points in Fire Strike, and the physical score was as high as 44204 points; as for the Time Spy test, the i9-12900KS achieved a score of 19692 points and a CPU score of 19761 points.


↑ 3DMark, the higher the score, the better.

3DMark CPU The test mainly tests the physical operation and custom simulation of the CPU, and tests the performance of 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 and the maximum thread of the processor respectively, and the performance of more than 16 threads will belong to 3D rendering, Audio and video output will be used. Generally, Direct X12 games prefer 8T threads, and the following threads are the preferences of old games.

The i9-12900KS has the highest CPU gaming performance from 1T to MAX, but the 5950X has higher performance at 16T.


↑ 3DMark CPU, the higher the score, the better.

9+2 AAA gaming games on processor performance test

9 AAA gamesPerformance test, the entry-level “F1 2021” racing game, “Tomb Raider: Shadow”, “The Division 2”, “Horizon: Expecting Dawn”, and the performance-heavy “Forbidden Land 3”, “Assassin’s Creed: Dimension” Beijing Era”, “Electric Rider 2077”, “Blood Killer 2” and “Polar Trench 6”, etc.

All tests were conducted with the In Game Benchmark at 1080p resolution and the game’s highest default settings.

In the 9 games tested this time, the i9-12900KS averaged 170.1 FPS and the i9-12900K also had an average of 170.2 FPS. In terms of game performance, the difference between the two is not large; but compared to the 5950X, the game performance is slightly lower, but due to time constraints Not enough to compare with the 5900X next time.


↑ Average FPS of 9 games, higher is better.


↑ The average FPS of the game, the higher the better.

E-sports games focus on the tactical and technical competition between players and teams, so they do not require much picture quality, which also allows such games to have a fairly high average FPS performance on high-end CPUs and GPUs, especially in 1080p resolution. Under the lower speed, the improvement of CPU performance and clock can increase the FPS performance of the game.

See also  Smartworking, a guide to dealing with stress when the office is at home

The test used two games, “Counter-Strike: Global Offensive” (CS:GO) and “Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six: Siege” (R6), and tested at 1080p resolution and the highest settings of the game.

The i9-12900KS achieved an average of 746.9 FPS in “CS:GO”, an average of 624 FPS in “R6”, and surpassed the i9-12900K in e-sports games. It is undoubtedly the strongest game processor at present.


↑ The average FPS of e-sports games, the higher the better.

i9-12900KS processor temperature and power consumption test

In terms of stress test, ROG STRIX LC II 280mm water-cooled radiator was used in the test to compare AIDA64 CPU, FPU and Cinebench R23 10min burn-in; for general computer use, the temperature performance was close to the AIDA64 CPU test, while the FPU test was the highest load and Higher power consumption.

During the i9-12900KS stress test, the CPU clock is P-core 5.1GHz, E-core 4.0GHz, the temperature is AIDA 64 CPU 65°C, FPU 92°C and Cinebench R23 10min temperature is 93°C; It is also reasonable that the temperature is higher than that of the i9-12900K under a high clock.

In other words, if you want to use the i9-12900KS processor, it is recommended to choose a 280mm, 360mm integrated water-cooling radiator, in order to give enough anti-thermal ability to play the high-clock performance of the processor.


↑ CPU temperature test.

The CPU power consumption is mainly based on CPU Package Power. The power consumption of the i9-12900KS in the AIDA64 CPU test reaches 163W, the FPU 247.9W, and the Cinebench R23 test reaches 266.9W. The overall power consumption is also higher than that of the i9-12900K. The next generation can have better performance in power consumption.


↑ CPU power consumption test.

i9-12900KS TVB 5.5GHz slightly difficult / manual overclocking can reach full core P 5.3GHz, E 4.2GHz

After testing, it is difficult to observe that the i9-12900KS is automatically overclocked to dual-core 5.5GHz according to TVB. The TVB temperature is limited to 50°C. When using Cinbench R23 single-core as the load, only one of the cores can be found at 5.5-5.2GHz. This is also related to the P-core temperature; and the PCMark 10 test also recorded a clock of 5.5GHz.

Since it’s spring break, I’m not sure whether it can be overridden by the TVB function of the motherboard. If the temperature limit of the TVB can be adjusted to 70°C, it is relatively easy, otherwise it will be dominated by the 5.2GHz of ABT.


↑ Cinbench R23 single core load, 1 core 5.5GHz observed.


↑ PCMark 10 test also recorded to 5.5GHz.

In terms of manual overclocking, the i9-12900KS has a pretty good physique. Under the settings of P-core 5.3GHz, E-core 4.2GHz, core 1.35V, LLC LV4, it can achieve a score of 30257 PTS in Cinebench R23, and the temperature during the test is still It can be pressed below 100°C without relaxing the upper temperature limit.

If you like overclocking, in short, the i9-12900KS has a special physique to meet the high clock requirements of TVB 5.5GHz and ABT 5.2GHz.


↑ i9-12900KS manually overclocked P-core 5.3GHz, E-core 4.2GHz.

Summarize

Surpassing its own strongest game processor, Intel Core i9-12900KS has a natural and special physique. With TVB up to 5.5GHz and ABT full-core 5.2GHz Turbo high clock, it can once again achieve higher multi-core, single-core The performance and the overall performance of the computer have been slightly improved, but the relative price has soared to $22,888, and the power consumption has been increased to 266.9W.

At the same time, the heat dissipation capability of the radiator is also tested. The condition of TVB dual-core 5.5GHz is the core temperature of 50°C. During the test, I only observed that one core reached 5.5GHz and jumped between 5.2-5.5GHz. From the BIOS TVB setting It seems that the temperature limit of TVB can be changed. If it can be relaxed to 70°C, it will be able to achieve dual-core 5.5GHz turbo clock.

Simply put, the Intel Core i9-12900KS is mainly for overclockers or flagship players with enough budget. It has the fastest desktop processor in the contemporary era, so price, temperature, and power consumption are not too big of a problem; the problem is How strong the core optimization of the next-generation Intel can be, and whether AMD Zen 4 can regain a city, let us look forward to the CPU war in the second half of the year, so stay tuned!

Further reading:

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Privacy & Cookies Policy