The crush of Giuseppe Pulina after yet another report on agriculture by the WWF: red meat is good for health.
The crush of Giuseppe Pulina after yet another report on agriculture by the WWF: red meat is good for health. The president of Sustainable Meats, expert in the livestock sector, comments on the alarming WWF report. A report underlines the seriousness of the environmental impact of agricultural activities and livestock. A crush contested by Roberto Piton, a consultant in the food sector, who dismisses the professor’s assertion.
If according to Pulina, energy consumption largely affects the environment, agriculture would only have a negligible impact. Not only that, because since 1990, its impact has decreased by 17% due to more sustainable models and the lower number of animals raised. Red meat, according to the president of Sustainable Meat, would be good for health and it would lengthen life. Furthermore, he warns of the dangers of the vegan diet.
You may also be interested in → Pasta and diabetes, how to lower your blood sugar immediately
Long live by eating red meat, the crazy claims
Not eating red meat, therefore, in Pulina’s words, would compromise human health. Furthermore, a lack of meat during development would also lead to cognitive deficits. Furthermore, the consumption of meat has nothing to do with the onset of heart disease, heart attacks and tumors. THE plant foodsinstead, they would even harm your health, because they would affect the degeneration of the intestine.
The beneficial effect of vegetables and cereals would be obtained only if associated with meats. Pulina also lashes out against vegetable meat, which is so fashionable, claiming that it contains numerous ultra-processed and harmful components. However, the professor’s words are disputed by Roberto Snapewho states that Pulina is only bringing water to his mill, being president of Carni Sostenibili.
The disputed claim
In short, he only looks at his own interests, making money from the meat and livestock trade. However, his words are of one unheard of gravityas science, for decades, has clarified the danger of meat on our body, especially red meat.
Pulina’s statements, in fact, contrast with the guidelines issued by the Food and Nutrition Research Center for a correct and healthy diet. There right and correct diet, in fact, it is the vegetable one, with the consumption of vegetables, fruit, cereals. Meat, especially red meat, is practically banned, or in any case it must be severely limited.
Those who consume vegetables and fruit in large quantities has less risk of getting sick. These foods protect against the risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer. Fibers and water in large quantities guarantee a virtuous diet for health. Pulina, therefore, with his statements goes against science and the actual data reported in hundreds of studies.
You may also be interested in → Eating too much red meat is bad for your health: the study
Meats, especially red and fatty ones, cause greater risks of cancer, type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular and degenerative problems of the body. At the most, experts warn, you can consume red meat two or three times a month, not more. Not to mention that all meat production, starting with intensive farming (beyond the moral question), produces unimaginable pollution, having a very strong impact on the environment.