According to the news on September 13th, the enterprise search APP showed thatRecently, the first-instance civil ruling on the tort liability dispute between Qu and Shenzhen Tencent Computer System Co., Ltd. was published.The plaintiff, Qu, claimed that he was banned by Tencent for disseminating illegal information because he sent emails through WeChat several times. Qu asked the defendant Tencent to pay 25 yuan for the daily loss during the period when his WeChat was blocked.
access:
Baidu network disk joint members buy 1 get 5: QQ music, Youku video…
The court held that the relevant case had been transferred to the Nanshan District People’s Court in Shenzhen, Guangdong Province for handling. The plaintiff’s lawsuit was a repeated lawsuit and the verdict was to reject Qu’s lawsuit.
The details of the judgment document show that the plaintiff in this case, while suing the defendant, provided the (2020) Liao 0281 and the early Republic of China 4531 civil ruling issued by the People’s Court of Wafangdian City, Liaoning Province on August 28, 2020. The above ruling found that although the reason for filing the case was It is a tort liability dispute, but it is a network service contract dispute. The Nanshan District People’s Court of Shenzhen, Guangdong Province has jurisdiction over this case, so it ruled that the case should be transferred to the Nanshan District People’s Court of Shenzhen, Guangdong Province for handling, and the ruling will take effect once it is made.
The plaintiff in this case is now filing a lawsuit with a tort liability dispute, which is a lawsuit for the matter that has already been filed after the judgment takes effect, and the litigants in this case are the same as the above one. The plaintiff’s claims, facts and reasons are consistent with the above case.
According to this, the plaintiff’s suit is a repeated suit, and the plaintiff’s suit should be rejected.
.