Original title: Anyang Procuratorate responds to the old case caused by dog wounding and is reviewing related cases
#安阳狗伤人事件拔狗女子被指擊万# On November 21, the media reported an old case led by the “dog biting” incident in Anyang, Henan. The woman holding the dog was accused of defrauding millions, and the case was filed for 8 years. Still unfinished. On November 22, the People’s Procuratorate of Anyang City responded to reporters saying that the city court is now reviewing the relevant cases it handles, and the local propaganda department needs to be consulted on the situation.
Du Qingda, the party involved in this case, claimed that 10 years ago, Li Xiaoying defrauded him of 1 million yuan for helping with affairs. After many negotiations to recover the funds failed, he reported to the Yindu Branch of the Anyang City Public Security Bureau. After filing and investigating, on January 23, 2013, Li Xiaoying was detained on suspicion of fraud and was later arrested and handed over to the Yindu District People’s Procuratorate for review and prosecution. In the meantime, the case was withdrawn for investigation by the Yindu District Procuratorate, and then submitted by the Yindu Public Security Bureau to supplement the evidence. In the end, the case was not submitted to the court after the second supplementary investigation. Before long, Li Xiaoying regained his “freedom.”
During the interview, the Yindu police officer surnamed Chen who was in charge of investigating the case confirmed to reporters that Li Xiaoying involved in Du Qingda’s case was also Li Xiaoying in the “dog biting” incident. At present, the case has not yet been settled. As for the reason, he said “it is hard to say.”
On November 22, the reporter contacted the Yindu District People’s Procuratorate on this matter. All five telephones could not be connected. The pages of its official website, including the introduction of the court, the leadership of the court, and the institution of the court were all blank. The relevant staff of the Anyang City People’s Procuratorate at its superior responded that, “The city court attaches great importance to this case and is now reviewing related cases. You need to consult the local propaganda department for relevant information, and they will give a unified response to the outside world.” (New Yellow River customer) end)
.