Since Novak Djokovic was blocked last Wednesday by the Border Force on his arrival in Australia, and his lawyers have filed an appeal against the expulsion, the wait has begun for the verdict that on the Italian night, at 10, Melbourne time, should put an end to the messy business that has monopolized the interest of the media these days. But the story does not necessarily end with an immediate “victory” or “defeat” of the number 1 in the world.
If federal court judge Anthony Kelly were to rule in Djokovic’s favor, the visa cancellation would be overruled, much to the scorn of the Australian federal government. In this case the champion’s attorneys asked – in a 35-page memorandum submitted to the court – that the champion be released no later than 5pm Australian time on Monday, so less than a week into the Australian Open.
The contagion, the appeal and the times that don’t add up: Djokovic and the Australian Open case
According to local law experts, however, in that case the government would almost certainly decide to appeal itself, forcing Djokovic to remain in a hotel again.
If, on the other hand, the appeal of the tennis player’s lawyers is rejected, it is likely that the government will try to board Djokovic on the first available plane. The suspensive deportation order that the federal judge has imposed on Interior Minister Karen Andrews expires at 4pm on Monday. But even in this case there could be some aftermath, because the Serbian lawyers would have the opportunity to present a further appeal, not on the merits but out of form – it is now clear that behind the matter there are bureaucratic issues, but also political and scarce ones. communication between the various offices… – which would further postpone the final decision. Also in the latter case Djokovic should remain under ‘arrest’ at the Park Hotel until the final decision of the court.
Djokovic’s mother: “They keep him prisoner in a dirty and insect-filled immigrant hotel”
