Home » Five former presidents reject Petro’s Constituent proposal

Five former presidents reject Petro’s Constituent proposal

by admin
Five former presidents reject Petro’s Constituent proposal

President Gustavo Petro’s current proposal to convene a Constituent Assembly has sparked a wave of criticism from 5 former Colombian presidents, who described the plan as “an act in opposition to the Constitution.” This controversial proposal, launched within the context of the Peace Accords, has sparked a heated debate concerning the stability of democracy and respect for the 1991 Constitution.

Context and Statements of Peter

President Gustavo Petro has emphasised many occasions that the facility of the folks should resolve whether or not he’ll proceed in workplace, and he insisted that the Congress should name a Constituent Assembly. “It will likely be mentioned that the Congress at present can play its historic function. The political dialogue is open. In my opinion, it’s within the energy of the Constituent of the folks to take action; It remains to be being mentioned what the technique of doing that may be: the Legislature is just one of a number of methods to specific the facility of the Constituent. Role which is historic for the Congress at present to think about its name, if not, the Constituent Power, quickly, will do this,” mentioned Petro.

The president additionally recommended that the Peace Accords might be the premise for convening a Constituent Assembly, an concept that provoked a unanimous response to the condemnation of 5 former presidents: Juan Manuel Santos, Iván Duque Márquez, Álvaro Uribe Vélez, Ernesto Samper Pizano and César Gaviria .

Reactions of Former Presidents

Cesar Gaviria (1990-1994) expressed that attempting to name a Constituent Assembly utilizing Peace Agreements is an act in opposition to the Constitution. «Respect is the primary assure that may be given to the folks of Colombia, that future selections come from the settlement and never from a veiled imposition. Trying to try this is an act in opposition to the Constitution of ’91, which nearly all of Colombians assist,” declared Gaviria. He added that Article 376 of the Constitution clearly states the one technique to name the Constitutional Council, and any try exterior of this framework might endanger the soundness of democracy.

See also  Latin American migrants allocate up to a quarter of their income to remittances

Juan Manuel Santos (2010-2018), the architect of the 2016 Peace Accords, criticized Petro’s proposal, stating that it has no authorized foundation. «The concept that the settlement is a particular settlement that the contracting events can change and has no authorized foundation as a result of particular agreements suggest that the battle between the events is ongoing. And it was not like that between the State and the FARC,” defined Santos. He urged the federal government to give attention to fixing the rising issues within the nation relatively than looking for a Constituent Assembly.

Ivan Duque (2018-2022) additionally spoke in opposition to it, accusing Petro’s authorities of eager to proceed in energy with out following constitutional procedures. “The undeniable fact that the president, who has not but turned two years previous, was already speaking about re-electing a politician and threatening that if he’s not allowed to remain till the folks say it, it is usually a relentless assault on the structure. ,” Duque mentioned, describing the proposal as an assault on the constitutional order and the president’s established insurance policies.

Alvaro Uribe (2002-2010) warned that convening a Constituent Assembly with out established procedures can be a coup d’état. “All standard actions, the best of the folks within the Basic Commission, all democratic expressions of participation, are strictly regulated within the Constitution, President Petro can not set up a unique means of calling the Constituent Assembly,” confused Uribe.

Ernesto Samper (1994-1998) emphasised that utilizing the Peace Agreement to convene a Constituent Assembly is just not authorized and can be a leap into house that might destroy the establishment. “It might be the Constituent Assembly, leaping into the institutional house that can begin by ignoring the Congress and the Constitutional Court,” warned Samper.

See also  Yopal firefighters rescued a man trapped in a planter – news

President Gustavo Petro’s proposal to convene a Constituent Assembly has been largely rejected by former Colombian presidents, who’ve warned that the transfer might disrupt democracy and violate the 1991 Constitution, its political system and the soundness of its constitutional framework.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Privacy & Cookies Policy