Home » Is Beijing nervous about a letter from the Qing Dynasty announcing the sovereignty of the disputed area? (Picture) | Paracel Islands | South China Sea | Asia

Is Beijing nervous about a letter from the Qing Dynasty announcing the sovereignty of the disputed area? (Picture) | Paracel Islands | South China Sea | Asia

by admin

Geographical location around the Paracel Islands (Image source: Wikimedia Commons)

[Look at China September 10, 2021 News]ChinaUsed to claim to haveSouth China SeaSovereignty, and cause various disputes. Bill Hayton is a British journalist and scholar. He found a letter in the British National Archives. It was written on August 8, 1899 by the Qing Dynasty Prime Minister’s Office to the British Legion in Beijing. The letter, clearly mentioned in the letter,Paracel IslandsIt is an “abandoned islands” and does not belong to China. Therefore, no special authority was responsible for policing them.

After the semi-official historical document was exposed, it attracted international attention. As China has always advocated the sovereignty of the islands in the South China Sea, it has even actively pursued military expansion.

According to Haydn’s report to Radio Free Asia, the translated letter found in the British National Archives may provide another piece of evidence to prove China’s claim of historic rights to the Paracel Islands in the South China Sea. Is untrustworthy.

More on that 1899 letter in which Qing China denied responsibility for the Paracel Islands – including very rare video of the researcher (me) at work… Good contextualising comments from @SteinTonnesson and @IanJStorey too… https://t.co/Oe85hQjP6n via @RadioFreeAsia

Haydn is the author of “Inventions of China” (2020) and “South China Sea” (2014). He found a translation of this letter from 1899 in the archives due to the “Bellona Copper Case” ( Bellona copper case), a German ship “Bellona” wrecked near the Paracel Islands, but the copper cargo on board was stolen by Chinese fishermen. Britain asked for compensation from the Qing court on behalf of Germany, but the Qing empire’s Prime Minister’s Yamen (equivalent to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs) stated that the islands were on the “high seas” and were not Chinese territory, so they had nothing to do with China and refused to compensate.

See also  No. 1 in China's original animation!"Wu Liuqi" produced by Shanghai has over 15 billion views, and the third season will be launched in October_玄武

In fact, not only this letter, Haydn said, he also found a transcript of another letter written by the then Governor of Guangdong and Guangxi to the British Consul in Guangzhou, Byron Brenan, on April 14, 1898, which also mentioned in the letter. Copper protection case. At that time, Governor Tan Zhonglin (that is, the first Guangzhou uprising that suppressed Sun Yat-sen during his tenure) wrote that the Chinese government could not protect the sunken ships because they were in the deep blue sea. Ting could not admit the claim for compensation.

In addition, the Governor of Indochina, France, in a letter to the French colonial minister in 1930 also mentioned the Bellona copper case. The letter quoted the Governor of Guangzhou, China as saying that the Paracel Islands are “abandoned islands”. , No longer belong to China but Vietnam, and no special authority was responsible for policing them.

Haydn said that the letter is currently only an English translation, and the Chinese document has not been found. It is very likely that it has been lost or damaged. However, Nguyen Nha, a well-known Vietnamese historian, said that this newly discovered letter can serve as another valuable piece of evidence, which seems to prove that China has not always insisted on owning Xisha since ancient times. Ownership of the islands.

Stein Tonnesson, a Norwegian historian and South China Sea researcher, said that the letter may have confirmed the source of other information, and also showed that the Qing Empire did not consider the Paracel Islands as Chinese territory at the time.

See also  Volunteer Blood Donation Warm Phase City- Huaibei News Net- Huaibei Authoritative News Website

According to the “Australian Financial Review” report, although the International Court of Justice made a ruling in accordance with the “United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea” in 2016, which stated that China does not own the resources of the South China Sea; The South China Sea is called the “nine-dash line” and belongs to China’s territorial waters.

Editor in charge: Wang Jun

Short URL of this article:

All rights reserved, any form of reprinting requires Chinese authorization. It is strictly forbidden to establish a mirror website.


[Honorary Member Wanted]Streams can merge into the sea, and small kindness can achieve great love. We sincerely recruit 10,000 honorary members from Chinese people around the world: each honorary member only needs to pay one subscription fee per year and become an honorary member of the “Watch China” website, which can help us break through the censorship and blockade and provide at least 10,000 mainland Chinese compatriots Provide independent and true key information to warn them in times of crisis and save them from the great plague and other social distress.
Honorary member

.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Privacy & Cookies Policy