[Epoch Times November 04, 2021](Reported by Epoch Times reporter Li Xin’an) Recently, a civil servant in Fujian reported in real name that several officials of the Xiamen Transportation System had accepted a banquet from a supervised subject and were suspected of exchanging interests through “tenders”, which triggered Outside attention.
In the past few days, an article entitled “Report on Serious Violation of Discipline to the Leadership of Xiamen City Transportation Bureau” has been circulated on the Internet, accompanied by pictures and videos of the banquet. The real-name informant claimed to be Chen Dejin, director of the Fourteenth Office of the Fujian Provincial Government.
The report letter named the Deputy Director, Director, and Chief of the Comprehensive Law Enforcement Detachment of the Xiamen Municipal Transportation Bureau, as well as a number of party and government officials, including the Secretary of the Party Committee of Xiamen Public Transport Group. They were accepted in the V18 box of Azhong Food Square, Siming District, Xiamen City. The entertainment of the regulated object and interested parties.
The whistleblower party secretly filmed and collected evidence outside the box, and recorded the scene in real time: starting at 18:23 on October 9th, the leading cadres named above, the supervised object and the interested parties carried out gambling activities, gambling prizes It is a shopping card. They took off their masks and stood around a table in the box, yelling excitedly from time to time, complimenting each other with “I’m Feeling Lucky”.
At 19:02 on October 9, the banquet began. A box of Feitian Moutai (6 bottles) and a box of Martell XO brandy (2 bottles) were placed prominently in the box. The total amount of vegetable gold that night was 2,996 yuan.
Pushing the cup and changing the cup, when the wine is hot, someone said: “Don’t worry, I know your business!” Another person immediately answered: “Come on! I will pay a glass to the King Bureau!” Secretary of the Party Committee, Executive Director of Xiamen Public Transport Group Bus Real Estate Sun Mou (voice can be distinguished) said: “I am Wang Ju’s younger brother. What the boss confessed, you must do a good job as a younger brother!”
At 21:26, the staff of Azhong Food Square bumped into the staff of the whistleblower who was shooting and collecting evidence, and immediately informed the officials in the V18 box.
According to the description, Sun Mou, executive director of Xiamen Public Transport Group Bus Real Estate, immediately rushed out of the box, pursued and intercepted the photographer on Jinbang Road, and was cleverly rid of by the staff.
The report also stated that the store on the first floor of Jinxiang Building, Jinbang Road, was a public transport property store of Xiamen Public Transport Group. Under the instructions of the leaders of the Transportation Bureau, many responsible persons of Public Transport Real Estate operated in the name of “tendering”, renting the store to Mr. Huang and his son at a price far below the market, seeking huge profits, and regularly “tributing to the leaders of the Transportation Bureau.” “.
Some local netizens told reporters that in principle, the incumbent “Zhao family” (referring to CCP dignitaries) do not publicly report their family members. Real-name reports by incumbent department-level cadres are relatively rare, and the local influence is also great. Some people say that under the guise of Chen’s name, the report is true.
According to the “Xiaoxiang Morning Post”, the informant photographed the front faces of many people in the box and marked each person’s identity in the picture. The reporter contacted the informant Mr. Chen, who stated that he had made a real-name report to the Xiamen Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection. The reporter Wang responded: “The content of the report is seriously inaccurate, and relevant departments have been involved in the investigation.”
The reporter dialed the phone number left in the report letter from Chen Dejin, in order to confirm his identity with the other party. After answering the call, the other party said that the Commission for Discipline Inspection is currently investigating, so it is not convenient to answer. “It’s not convenient for me to say now, but I have to be sure that everything is true.” He said.
Weibo user “Iron Man Viewpoint” posted, “Tonight (October 31) I received a call from Chen Dejin, Director of the 14th Office of the Fujian Provincial Government. He said that this report was not the work of him…”
The reporter called the Xiamen Discipline Inspection Commission several times to inquire about the investigation, but the other party did not answer.
The reporter sent a letter to Xiamen Public Transport Group requesting comment. As of press time, no response has been received. He also called the contact person in the bid opening room of the Group Asset Management Co., Ltd. to inquire about the bidding situation. At first, the other party said that the reporter had made a mistake, and then asked what was wrong. Later, he said that he was not clear, and then hung up the phone.
Xiamen Public Transport Group was asked to rectify
According to the website of the Xiamen Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision, in November 2018, the second inspection team of the Xiamen Municipal Party Committee gave feedback to the Party Committee of Xiamen Public Transport Group and raised 39 questions in 26 items in 6 areas. It clearly pointed out that the party committee of Xiamen Public Transport Group violated the eight central regulations, falsely reported and falsely received operating subsidies, business entertainment management was chaotic, and public funds travel in disguise.
The problem of asset leasing is frequent, causing serious loss of state-owned assets. Including (1) the issue of public bidding and leasing not in accordance with the regulations. (2) Poor lease management. In addition, there are also problems of project bidding and construction management confusion.
In the Xiamen bus arson case in 2013, 47 people were killed and 34 people were injured. The accident occurred on the Xiamen BRT (Bus Rapid Transit) line. Its operating unit is Xiamen Rapid Transit Operation Co., Ltd., and its parent company is Xiamen Public Transport Group Co., Ltd.
At the time, it was noticeable that the bus was a closed compartment, and it was difficult to escape through the window with a life-saving hammer. The bus companies’ use of integrated windows instead of sliding windows is accused of considering cost.
Editor in charge: Gao Jing#
.