TREVISO. “The problem exists, as Favero think so many», Says a Northern League administrator of the Left Piave,« And the cement is not the only point of tension between the Region and the territory ». Reference to the authorization to dig again at the Morganella quarry? To the divergences on the Ciano expansion tank? Late for the Vidor bridge?
When in doubt, the cement brought by the house plan, launched by the Zaia junta in 2009, finally corrected by law 14/2019 “Veneto 2050” on building permits, restrictions and urban redevelopments.
«Too much concrete, the rules must be changed “, Favero said bluntly. Until 2011 the municipalities could define the areas on which to exclude any application of the 2009 plan, then the prerogative was removed.
It is no coincidence that the mayor of Castelfranco Stefano Marcon, also president of the Province, complained of the impotence of the municipalities after the recent sentence of the Council of State on the too high buildings erected in Castelfranco. “The law was born out of an economic and financial emergency, it had no urbanistic thrusts,” he observes Marco Serena, mayor of Villorba, “Beyond merit, there is a problem of skills to be redesigned».
RadioLega confirms that the malaise exists, beyond the striking cases that ended up in front of the TAR, which did not agree with the “cementist” line and the push on heights ”. On the political level, Favero seems isolated.
The provincial commissioner of the Lega Gianangelo does not follow him Bof.“The house plan was used to recover abandoned buildings, I am also an administrator, there have been many positive aspects, from the recovery of abandoned areas to the reduction of the disfigurement of the territory. There may be aspects to improve, but I also remember the law on land use, target zero. And I say that the laws are made collectively, in the appropriate places, Favero knows where to bring contributions and observations, in the Region, to improve things ».
They say that in Venice, Favero’s position has sent more than a few into a rage: it is not every day that a councilor, however authoritative and protégé of the governor, criticizes a pivotal law of Zaia administration and coalition. Among those who did not really like there would be Silvia Rizzotto, president of the town planning commission, former leader of the Zaia list. But he doesn’t reply directly, and he prefers to dot the i’s.
“I state, talking about a house plan is wrong, today the law 14/2019 “Veneto 2050“”, Explains the former mayor of Altivole, former president of AscoHolding, “Favero speaks in a personal capacity, law 14 has set limits and constraints with respect to the previous law, which has relaunched the entire construction sector and has recovered disused complexes, albeit with some distortions and punches in the eye certainly not wanted. Limits have been introduced in agricultural areas, municipalities have prerogatives on the most voluminous complexes in the Pua (urban implementation plans ed). The law has given stability and certainty to the municipalities, technicians and professionals, and provides for a 3-year check, therefore in ’22: all the investigations will be made there, we will discuss ».
Nor does Rizzotto stop there: «Objectively, as I read Favero, I also say that we receive requests to the contrary, for further exceptions and flexibility, also from provincial capitals: an administrator must reconcile and mediate between the various instances. In the future we will insist on building credits and regeneration, it is the main road to the goal, the zero consumption of soil “
And Favero’s political superior also insists on this point, the leader of the Zaia list, but also president of the majority intergroup Alberto Villanova: «It is inevitable that there are different sensitivities on such delicate issues», Specifies the former provincial councilor from Pievigino,« A check is planned, we’ll do it. But I tell everyone that we have always worked to safeguard the territory, while at the same time protecting the construction sector, favoring the recovery of existing buildings ». –