Why did you sign the appeal of Dacia Maraini who wishes a woman on the hill? ». The real question would be “Why not?” Unfortunately, everything will be consumed with the usual bru gossipparo-institutional and once again we will have to wait, if all goes well, for another round of merry-go-round.
The appeal is a provocation to underline a macroscopic backwardness of our country that all politicians recognize in words by lowering their eyes in a voice of circumstance: “Oh, if it were for me … let alone” and in the general confusion they just throw the press women’s names more or less eligible to prove their feminist faith, but in the secret chambers of power the machine is already moving in another direction. And everyone knows it. Another real question would be: «But could it be that there isn’t a woman suitable for this role in the whole country? And if so, why not nominate her? ».
But they are all obvious that answer themselves and yet we are still here to defend ourselves from the accusation of wanting a dictatorship of the pink quotas, whatever the cost: “So it’s enough that it’s a woman, is everything okay?”. With what we have seen so far and with certain names that are circulating one would answer: “Yes, of course.” Fortunately, however, the choice of excellent and suitable female figures, albeit submerged and often made invisible by the institutions, is so wide that the problem does not arise. Provided that the criterion of choice is still the merit – as is flaunted to the four winds. But is it?