Home » The CCP once called “end the one-party dictatorship” Luo Huining slapped the CCP’s mouth | National Security Law | Communist Party | One Country, Two Systems

The CCP once called “end the one-party dictatorship” Luo Huining slapped the CCP’s mouth | National Security Law | Communist Party | One Country, Two Systems

by admin

[Epoch Times June 16, 2021](Interviews by Hong Kong Epoch Times reporters Wu Michen and Zhang Xiaohui) Luo Huining, director of the Liaison Office of the Hong Kong Central Committee, said at the forum on June 12 that he clamored for “ending the one-party dictatorship” and denying the CCP The leadership of one country, two systems is “destroying the foundation of the one country, two systems system and is the true enemy of Hong Kong’s prosperity and stability.” Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam said in early June that it was difficult to comment on whether “ending the one-party dictatorship” violated the “National Security Law.” The implementation of one country, two systems under the rule of the Communist Party.

Listen to the news:

(For more information, please go to the “Listening Era” platform)

Lin Zheng mentioned that he agreed with Luo Huining’s statement of “accumulating non-conformity” in the past few decades, saying that what everyone has been doing in the past is actually wrong. Shi Shan, an expert on China issues and a senior media person, said that this statement seriously violates the principles of common law, because the common law in the United Kingdom and the United States is a customary law, not a statutory law, so Luo Huining’s statement is legally problematic. If we go back to the source, the first “non” is the leader of the Chinese Communist Party Deng Xiaoping.

Shi Shan pointed out that if one says that “one country, two systems” cannot be criticized, the well water does not offend the river, and everyone does not interfere with each other. Isn’t the Communist Party also not allowed to criticize the Hong Kong system? If you criticize Hong Kong’s one country, two systems in mainland China, shouldn’t it violate Hong Kong’s national security law and should be arrested? If someone criticizes Hong Kong’s capitalist system, capitalists, democrats, courts, etc., should that person be arrested? This is the theory.

Regarding Lam Cheng’s claim that “one country, two systems” was initiated by the CCP, Shi Shan retorted that before 1997, Hong Kong and the United Kingdom were also one country with two systems. He went on to say that any multi-ethnic empire in history has implemented one country, multiple systems. The Manchus implemented different systems for Tibet, Xinjiang, and Northeast China. “Every time it is said that one country, two systems is an initiative of the CCP, it is all a lie.”

Lin Zheng said that he agreed with Luo Huining’s three-point vision, which mentioned that the need to continue to promote one country, two systems and continue to uphold the Communist Party of China as the ruling party of the People’s Republic of China is also the characteristic of socialism with Chinese characteristics in the Constitution. However, Shi Shan pointed out that there are many logical traps in it. “She thinks that she can get rid of the crime of undermining one country, two systems by making use of some logical arguments.” If the Constitution must be respected, should Marxism and Mao Zedong Thought in the Constitution be implemented? Doctrine is dominated by public ownership, and capitalists must wipe it out. These are all written in the constitution.

See also  Xi Jinping and General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Vietnam Nguyen Phu Trong jointly met with representatives of young people and friendly people from China and Vietnam

Throughout the speech, Lam Zheng only used specious words to affirm and cater to Luo Huining’s statement, avoiding specific things, and absolutely not mentioning a certain clause or detail. Questions that everyone wants to know, such as: is the downfall of the Communist Party a violation of the National Security Law, and whether the opposition to a one-party dictatorship is an enemy of Hong Kong, etc. He said that Carrie Lam was helping the Liaison Office of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the Communist Party of China to explain all the practices, activating the skills of the “Kickman”, like a dog catching a frisbee lost by the owner, and accepting any remarks from his superiors without his own opinion.

Lin Zheng mentioned that it is necessary to continuously improve and implement the Basic Law, and implement the systems and mechanisms and even laws related to one country, two systems. She also emphasized that re-examining whether each system is compatible with the same country and two systems, also said that there are gray areas that can be easily exploited. For example, the election system is modified to plug loopholes. Shi Shan pointed out that Carrie Lam is suggesting that the red line is constantly changing and adjusting, whether it violates the Basic Law or whether the basic system is in violation of the basic system. It is her who is in charge anyway. In fact, she is constantly moving the dragon gate.

Shi Shan said, however, this red line is not a red line recognized by everyone, and no one knows where the red line is. “I’m telling the truth, Carrie Lam doesn’t know it, because there are people behind it, moving forward for a while, and then for a while. In the end, everyone’s best practice is to do nothing and lie flat together.” Become like mainland China.

Lam Cheng expressed that he can communicate and interact with the industry and make some guidelines more specific to reduce the industry’s misgivings and protect creative freedom. Shi Shan believes that this is obviously impossible, because Carrie Lam herself said that she must constantly “improve” the system, laws, etc., which means that she must constantly change, “Today she communicated with you, and tomorrow she will perfect you again. ‘Go inside, and she will be held accountable a few years ago.”

See also  [Front-line interview]Ningbo owner blocked Ping An Bank to seek hard-earned money | Blu-ray | Rights Protection

Recently, Liang Zhenying and others criticized Carrie Lam with the “Send to China Regulations”. Shi Shan believes that Carrie Lam is also trying to explain the regulations for her this time. The implication is that she has done nothing wrong, and what she has done in the past has been constantly “improving” the Basic Law. .

Shi Shan bluntly said that it violated Hong Kong’s separate legislation and law enforcement from the very beginning. The National Security Law was not established by Hong Kong itself, but by the People’s Congress of the Communist Party of China. Therefore, Hong Kong can’t talk about any legal system, and the previous democratic mechanism is completely complete. No more.

As for overthrowing the Communist Party and opposing the one-party dictatorship, does it violate the National Security Law?

The Xinhua Daily, the central organ of the Communist Party of China before 1949, had a clear stand on this. “Xinhua Daily” editorial on January 28, 1945 stated: “The Chinese people are working hard for democracy. What they want is naturally genuine products, not substitutes. Putting the one-party dictatorship into makeup is a substitute for democracy. It is ingenious, but it is a thousand miles away from the wishes of the people. The Chinese people are watching with open eyes: Don’t use democratic substitutes to deceive us!”

The former leader of the Communist Party of China, Liu Shaoqi, wrote on pages 172 to 177 of “The Selected Works of Liu Shaoqi”, Volume I, which also mentioned: “The Communist Party wants to seize power and establish the Communist Party’s’one-party dictatorship’. This is a malicious rumors and slander. The Communist Party. Oppose the’one-party dictatorship’ of the Kuomintang, but do not establish the’one-party dictatorship’ of the Communist Party.” Liu Shaoqi believes that “the main key to implementing democratic politics is to end the one-party rule of the country.” Otherwise, no matter what tricks are used, the so-called democracy is just Empty has its name.

Shi Shan asked in turn: Are these statements in violation of the National Security Law?

As of May 23, 2021, 107 people in Hong Kong have been arrested for endangering national security, 57 of them have been prosecuted, and 44 of them have been remanded without conviction. Among them were those who participated in the primary election of 35+ democrats last year and were charged with the crime of “subverting state power.” Shishan pointed out that it is totally unreasonable in legal theory, because the state power is generally understood as the government, and participation in elections is to subvert the government, and Hong Kong citizens have the right to vote, so the accusation violates the basic principles of the system.

See also  Trade unionist killed, the defense of the truck driver: "Very serious episode, but it was an accident"

The Hong Kong government has recently been tightening the freedom of the news and film and television industries. Tsai Yu-ling, the director of Radio Hong Kong’s “The Sound of Sound”, was sued, and programs such as “The Sound of Sound” and “The Sound of Sound” were selected and inserted into the “Discussion on the June 4th” running event. Affair” was investigated and punished.

On June 11, the Hong Kong government suddenly announced the revision of the “Guidelines for Inspectors Regarding Film Censorship”, which caused a great backlash in the film industry. Some insiders asked whether the movies that bombed the building or the airport could not be broadcast? In his speech, Lam Cheng reassures the literary and artistic circles that the amendment to the regulations is like the implementation of the “Hong Kong version of the National Security Law” in June last year. It only punishes people and things that violate national security and will not affect the freedom of most citizens.

Shi Shan said that he believes that Hong Kong’s standards will gradually finally match that of the mainland. For example, he said that the Central Propaganda Department has very detailed requirements, and that the color of the national flag cannot be dimmed or lower than other flags, and so on. In addition, unless specifically approved by the Central Propaganda Department, all movies in mainland China cannot use police as bad actors. “There are too many police in Hong Kong movies. According to China’s red line, these will no longer work.”

Regarding Carrie Lam’s belief that Hong Kong’s creativity will not disappear, Shi Shan pointed out that if we follow this standard, Hong Kong’s movies are already dead, and many of the previous things can’t be released. He said that in fact, the creativity of Hong Kong in the past two decades has disappeared. The Communist Party used the mainland market to attract Hong Kong filmmakers, but it used the so-called “electric censorship” to conduct political censorship, which made “anyone who has objections to it will not work,” he said. All innovations and ideas are gone”, and now it has been done directly by the Hong Kong government, “it is just the last nail in the nail.”

As for the future development of Hong Kong’s film industry? He laughed and said, “We can continue filming “The Great Cause of Party Building” and have been filming hundreds of popular movies.”

Editor in charge: Lian Shuhua #

.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Privacy & Cookies Policy