[EpochTimesDecember192021]Song Gengyi, a female teacher at Shanghai Aurora Vocational College, was reported by a student during her lecture because she questioned the lack of historical data on the death data of the Nanjing Massacre and was expelled. Recently, it has continuously caused a tsunami of public opinion. Many scholars supported Song Gengyi, and the informant student Dong Xun was also exposed by netizens and was tampered with.
Listen to the news:
(For more information, please go to “Listening to the Era”)
On December 14, Song Gengyi hoped to rationally explore historical facts in class. She said that no matter how many people were killed in the Nanjing Massacre, we have no historical data to support this period of history. She also said to the students: “You should not hate, but think about how the war came. This is the most important thing.”
It was alleged that Song Gengyi was subsequently reported by students, and some videos of the lecture were also uploaded on Weibo by the students, causing public opinion.
The little pinks bombarded Song Gengyi for “denying the massacre caused by the Japanese militarist invading army in Nanjing and denying the heinous crimes committed by Japanese militarism.” They conducted a “human search” on Song Gengyi.
Song Gengyi was expelled from the college for the above remarks. According to the school’s report, Song Gengyi, a teacher at the Oriental Film Academy of the school, made false statements in the “News Interview” on December 14 and expelled him on the grounds of “causing major teaching accidents and adverse social impact.” .
In the afternoon of the same day, the official microblog of the People’s Daily, the mouthpiece of the Communist Party of China, issued an article severely criticizing Song Gengyi for “failed to be a teacher and a countryman.”
On the 17th, the complete video of Song Gengyi’s teaching was exposed. In her class, she only discussed the rigor of the number of 300,000 victims in the Nanjing Massacre. She doubted that the 300,000 victims may have been exaggerated. She hoped to verify and verify the identity of the victims with a serious attitude. Record and track down the cause of the war.
She said, “The Japanese army did act against humanity in Nanjing back then. Why did they do such anti-human behavior? I think we need to do special research. One point to study is that the Japanese army invading China killed in Nanjing. How many people? There is no data to support 300,000 people. 300,000 people are roughly estimated from one person’s notes, some are estimated to be 3000, some are estimated to be 20,000, some are estimated to be 500,000, and some are estimated to be 70,000. Liberation After that, Chinese historians searched for the words of one of them, 300,000 as the data of the Nanjing Massacre, and then kept them.”
The public opinion generally believes that Song Gengyi’s remarks are not wrong. Many scholars and self-media people also voiced support for Song Gengyi’s objective statement of facts.
Many lawyers expressed their solidarity on the Internet, and many lawyers hoped that she would stand up and sue Shanghai Aurora College. Radio Free Asia reported that senior lawyer Ran Tong pointed out that the lawyers all hope to provide assistance to Teacher Song Gengyi, but they have not been able to contact her. But the official media, including the “People’s Daily”, did not respond to this.
Mr. Zhao, a senior media person, revealed that although many media persons and legal persons complained for Teacher Song Gengyi, he believed that his speech was quickly blocked by the authorities. Although there are other students who have also expressed grievances for the teacher and published the personal information of the informant student on the Internet, I believe that the official will not deal with the student who framed the teacher. He lamented that the normal academic logic and social logic disappeared.
Mr. Zhao said: This is because there is no logic in this country. I think it is the official pushing this matter. People have been fired, so they will continue to fight to the end. I shared a very rational analysis, all of which were deleted. But I also saw someone report him (the informant student) on Twitter. I don’t think he will be dealt with in any way.
A well-known commentator, Wang Wusi, stated in an article that the current public opinion atmosphere can be described as smoky. Good people dare not speak up. Evil people refer to deer as horses. If everything is unreasonable and lawless, one sentence “You are not patriotic” can be cited. I can’t argue with a hundred words for what I have pointed out.
The self-media people who signed the “Second Uncle” posted on social media: From the beginning, they were deliberately digging holes for their preaching teachers, and even deliberately chopped off the head and tail, edited some parts, and framed themselves. teacher. Of course, the biggest tragedy may be that they don’t think there is anything wrong with it at all, and may even be very proud.
A large number of netizens were angry at the whistleblower’s out-of-context reporting behavior, and some public opinion demanded severe punishment for the informant students. However, relevant speeches were quickly blocked by the authorities.
At the same time, the informant Dong Xun was also searched by human flesh.
Dong Xun’s mobile phone number was also posted on the Internet. He said that his mobile phone was bombarded with a large number of verification code text messages every day, as well as a large number of harassing calls. He claimed that he did not realize the seriousness of the matter and did not realize that his privacy was leaked. Dong Xun said that he had called the police.
The current event is still further fermenting.
So far, Song Gengyi himself has no public voice. The media even worried that she would be imprisoned due to official pressure. They all sighed that Song Gengyi, an excellent teacher and journalism teaching practitioner, was taken away from his job and staged a farce of “reverse elimination of colleges and universities” when he was reported by a student with an out-of-context editing.
Radio Free Asia reported that according to the telephone number on the official website of Shanghai Aurora College, the college refused to respond to this matter and hung up the phone directly because the school did not have a propaganda department. The student surnamed Dong, who was accused of being the informer, had been called many times, and his cell phone had been turned off.
Editor in charge: Fang Xiao#
.