The monthly salary of in-home teachers who have been reduced by double reductions exceeds 30,000 and is packaged as “new housekeeping”: the official has made it clear that it is a violation of regulations
Under the “double reduction” policy, discipline-based training institutions are strictly supervised, and a large number of companies withdraw.
The training institutions that used to be crowded, people go to empty buildings, education and training workers enter the talent market looking forward to transformation and job opportunities, but the parents who look forward to their children are also at a loss.
“If you don’t make up classes, my child will definitely fall behind other children.” In response to this demand, “home teacher”, a profession that is not unpopular, has quietly emerged, wandering in a gray area on the fringe of policies, and even being packaged as a “new housekeeping”. “.
Behind the “new housekeeping” is the high monthly salary of 20,000 to 50,000, which not only allows the former frontline employees of education and training to see the hope of reemployment, but also full of temptations for the high-achieving students in Qingbei.
Although the “residential teacher” still seems to be in a dilemma that is difficult to supervise and deal with, it is still unknown whether the high expenditure can bring corresponding returns.
On September 6 this year, the General Office of the Ministry of Education issued the “Notice on Resolutely Investigating and Dealing with Disguised Violations of Subject-based Off-campus Training Issues”, which clearly prohibits organizations or individuals with incomplete licenses that violate relevant regulations of the training subject and conduct consultation and cultural dissemination. , “Housekeeping Services”, “Home Teachers”, “Crowdfunding Private Education” and other names violated the regulations to carry out subject training.
In fact, residential teachers are not only after the “double reduction”, they are more like a new variant of the family education industry.
A few years ago, “Tutoring O2O” once occupied the market with a prairie fire. Parents can find tutors in their city through the APP, which not only saves the cost of finding an intermediary, but also reduces the time cost of rushing to class. Most importantly, the teacher’s teaching qualifications and evaluations of the teaching situation on the platform Nothing more, no matter how you look at it, it’s a “good business“. Statistics show that from 2013 to 2016, more than two thousand companies poured into the tutoring O2O market.
But the platform underestimated the determination and patience of parents. The ultimate goal of parents is the effect, not the price or the distance. As long as you can find a suitable teacher, any price is worth it, and these are exactly what the tutor O2O can’t achieve. In the end, the tutor O2O failed to cultivate competitive giants. After the capital was cold, most of the companies fell quickly and disappeared for a while.
A practitioner told China News Weekly that the biggest obstacle to the profession of home-teacher at present is the policy. The policy is explicitly forbidden, and it is packaged in domestic service. In fact, it is easy to be found and eventually banned. Secondly, a young person who becomes a home-teacher will have problems with career planning. The professional experience of being a home-teacher can hardly be connected with any job experience.
Many young people expect to “jump up to a higher level” through residential teachers. Many invisible publicity by home teachers mention luxury cars, villas, and upper-class life, but in fact, the possibility of residential teachers “jumping to higher levels” through work is very low. Zhou Yang has seen a lot of home teachers from wealthy families. From the aspect of face and conversation, it seems that they have not “jumped up” because of their work, but their salary may be higher than that of himself.
– THE END –
Please indicate the source for reprinting: Fast Technology
#teacher#Learn
Editor in charge: Snowflake
.