Home » What problems are the top leaders prone to appear and what practical measures are proposed in the first special document?

What problems are the top leaders prone to appear and what practical measures are proposed in the first special document?

by admin

What are the problems that top leaders are prone to? What practical measures are proposed in the first special document

Solving the problem of leading supervision

Recently, the “Opinions of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on Strengthening the Supervision of “Top Leaders” and the Leading Group” was publicly released. This is the first special document formulated by our party for the supervision of “top leaders” and the leadership team.

Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, historical achievements have been made in comprehensively and strictly governing the party. The anti-corruption struggle has achieved an overwhelming victory and has been consolidated in an all-round way. However, the supervision of “top leaders” is still a weak link. What problems are prone to appear in the position of “top leader”? What is the cause of the problem? What harm does it bring? What is the current state of supervision over the “top leaders”? The “Opinions” announced this time put forward what practical measures to strengthen the supervision of “top leaders”?

“Top leaders” are often regarded by lawbreakers as the key targets of the corroded hunting

On June 2, the website of the State Supervision Commission of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection announced that Meng Yongshan, the chief procurator of the Qinghai Provincial People’s Procuratorate, was suspected of serious violations of discipline and law and was subject to examination and investigation by the State Supervision Commission of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection. The day before, Gan Rongkun, member of the Standing Committee of the Henan Provincial Party Committee and Secretary of the Political and Legal Committee, fell from the horse. Both persons were investigated in the position of the “first in command”.

A review of the investigation and investigation news and “double opening” notices issued by the Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision at all levels found that among the corrupt elements investigated and dealt with, there were many “top leaders”. Taking the data of 2020 as an example, a total of 5,836 “top leaders” at county level and above have been filed and investigated by disciplinary inspection and supervision agencies across the country. From the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China to the end of 2020, more than 80% of the leading cadres at or above the departmental level and above reported by the “Examination and Investigation” section of the National Supervisory Commission’s website of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection have been “top leaders”.

Judging from the situation in some provinces, 16 of the 19 counties and cities in Hainan Province have experienced party and government “top leaders” illegal crimes since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, accounting for 84.2%; the 19th National Congress of the Liberal Party of Guangdong Province As of the end of August 2020, a total of 418 department-level cadres were filed for review and investigation, of which 242 were “top leaders” or former “top leaders”, accounting for 58%. A large number of facts show that the “top leader” is in charge of a party and a domain, and is often regarded by lawbreakers as a key target for wooing, corroding, and hunting, and it is prone to problems.

Analyzing the characteristics of serious violations of discipline and law by “top leaders” in recent years, the problems are all around the word “power”. The degeneration of “top leaders” is often the result of “desire to follow power and bribery to gather power”.

In December 2020, Zhang Qi, former member of the Standing Committee of the Hainan Provincial Party Committee and former secretary of the Haikou Municipal Party Committee, was sentenced to life imprisonment for accepting bribes. Zhang Qi has worked in Hainan for more than 30 years. He abused public power and used power for profit, cleverly established projects to reclaim land from the sea, develop illegally, and turn land resources into a tool for making money. This is a typical example of “relying on land to make money.”

The review and investigation found that there are many cases in which leading cadres use their powers and positions to intervene in land projects to obtain huge profits. From April 2017 to January this year, disciplinary inspection and supervision agencies at all levels in Hainan Province investigated and dealt with 515 corruption cases involving engineering fields, involving 536 people, involving 49% of relevant city and county leadership members, and “top leaders” accounting for 30%; Among the cases investigated and handled by the Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision, 69% of the cases involved corruption in the engineering field, and “top leaders” accounted for 59%.

“Driven by the wrong concept of power, a few’top leaders’ regard power, money, and pleasure as their life pursuits, and run counter to their purpose of serving the people wholeheartedly. They use the power conferred by the people for their own benefit, harming the prestige of the party and the party. The cause.” Song Wei, director of the Center for Integrity Research, University of Science and Technology Beijing, analyzed.

See also  How does Jessica Cediel look without a drop of makeup?

The problem of the “top leader” does not only involve itself, but also often has a bad impact on the political ecology of a place or department. As a “squad leader”, the problem of the “top leader” is very easy to spread, endanger the team, bring damage to the team, and often “pull out the carrots and bring out the mud” when being investigated.

Zhang Jie, the former party secretary and president of Edong Medical Group, was “hunted” by illegal drug dealers and medical device manufacturers, and he acted arbitrarily, turning greed into an incurable “tumor” and spreading the “virus” to the group. Other cadres have led to corruption cases. From 2016 to 2018, more than 20 members of the Edong Medical Group team and cadres and employees of affiliated hospitals have been investigated and dealt with on suspicion of duty crimes.

“The damage caused by the corruption of the’top leader’ far exceeds that of the average leading cadre, and the resulting’corrosive’ effect is stronger.” Song Wei believes that the corruption of the top leader can easily lead to a collective corruption “house”, the amount involved and the amount involved. The plots are relatively more serious.

The common problems of “top leaders” in violation of discipline and law highlight the importance and urgency of strengthening supervision

On May 24, according to the website of the State Supervision Commission of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection, Xiao Yuhai, the former member of the Standing Committee of the Qinghai Provincial People’s Congress (the former party secretary and chairman of Qinghai Credit Guarantee Group Co., Ltd.) was expelled from the party and from public office. The report pointed out that Xiao Yuhai was disloyal and honest to the party, engaged in double-facedism, and became a “dual-faced man.”

In the notification of the “top leader” party discipline and government sanctions, “two-faced people” frequently appeared. Some “top leaders” are polite on stage, corrupt and betray the law, sit in front of them, and behind are arrogant and extravagant. Since what is said and what is done are “clearly separated”, once they are “fallen”, it will cause a great contrast and cause great damage to the image of the party and the government.

When it comes to Mou Wenyong, the former party secretary and director of the Sichuan Metallurgical and Geological Exploration Bureau, most of his colleagues felt that he was a principled and prudent “good leader” until he was subject to an organizational review and investigation for serious violations of discipline and law. Some people also said ” unbelievable”.

“I sang tunes on stage and collected tickets offstage; I said one way to dress up in front of people, and to do a set of indulgence after people. I completely became a political’two-faced person’.” During the censorship and investigation, Mou Wenyong was like this. Reflect on what you have done.

In order to avoid organizing investigations while arbitrarily accumulating money, the “top-in-chief” trading method of power and money has become increasingly concealed and renovated——

Some have created small circles of co-corruption and profit-seeking, and have formed a “co-corruption circle” with unscrupulous businessmen using power and interests as the link. Wang Jie, the former secretary of the Xiushan County Party Committee of Chongqing City, used his power to transfer profits and frequently helped more than 10 bosses in the “circle” “greet” and “give the green light” in terms of project contracting and real estate certificate processing, in order to receive huge amounts of property.

Some have carefully packaged power and money transactions to make corruption seem “seamless” in terms of procedures. In order for a group in Wuhan to win the bid, Zhang Jie deliberately instructed to switch the project to Wuhan to open the bid, and increased the number of reviewers from 7 to 9, increasing the weight of the hospital reviewers, and through bid rigging and collusion to ensure that the group won the bid smoothly. Zhang Jie received 375,000 yuan in benefits.

Some use “Yahao” as the medium to put the word “Ya” on the transaction of power and money. Zhan Shunzhou, the former secretary of the Dunhuang Municipal Party Committee of Gansu Province, claimed to be an expert in jade. The jade sent by the merchant boss and cadres first evaluated the jade himself. Go to the store he designated. The final result was that the money to buy jade was moved into his pocket.

Sorting out the many cases of “top leaders”‘s willful abuse of power, their corruption is often inseparable from the domineering work style. The key position of the “top leader” has become their reckless capital. “One word” for decision-making, “one sentence” for employing people, and “one pen” for spending money have become common problems for the “top leaders” who have lost their horses.

Xi Chuanliang, the former director of the Hainan Provincial Public Resources Trading Service Center, is arbitrarily determined at work, and he basically has the final say. From 2013 to 2015, Xi Chuanliang helped businessman Shi to contract 34 hardware and software projects and maintenance projects of the Provincial Government Procurement Center. There is no relationship between some projects. Xi Chuanliang “packaged” them as “sub-projects” or “follow-up service projects” of the projects that Shi has contracted, and directly contracted them to Shi to undertake. In order to thank Xi Chuanliang for his help, Shi Moufen gave him a total of 410,000 yuan several times.

See also  Seeking justice for the common people, dispelling the society, the head of the Seventh Department of the Supreme Procuratorate answers reporters’ questions on a series of typical cases of administrative procuratorial work with the people_Supervision

“Some’top leaders’ blatantly violated the’three important and one big’ collective decision-making system when they encountered major problem decision-making, important cadre appointment and removal, major project investment decision-making, large-scale capital use and other situations that should have been made through collective discussion. Ask the organization for instructions and make a decision without authorization. These serious violations of party discipline have caused heavy economic losses to the party and the country.” Song Wei said.

Supervision of all parties should resonate at the same frequency to form a joint force for the supervision of the “top leader”

Analyzing and prosecuting the cases of “top leaders” found that, in addition to subjective reasons such as lack of ideals and beliefs and fluke, too much power and lack of effective supervision and control are also very important reasons.

How to effectively supervise and restrict the power of the “top leaders” and the leadership team to ensure their correct and clean use of power is not only related to the full play of the role of the “top leaders” and the leadership team, but also related to the economic and social development of a place. In recent years, many places have actively explored the supervision of “top leaders”, but the problem of “supervision by superiors is too far, supervision by the same level is too soft, and supervision by subordinates is too difficult” still exists to varying degrees, making the task of supervising the “top leaders” Still very urgent.

For “top leaders” at all levels, the top-down supervision of the party organization is the most direct and authoritative. A review of relevant cases found that some higher-level party organizations only pay attention to the supervision of the work of the “top leaders” at lower levels, and often turn a blind eye to their thinking and style, especially the supervision of integrity and self-discipline and the performance of the party’s main responsibility for governing the party; some supervision methods Single, limited to regular reports, written reports, inspections and investigations, etc., without forming a standardized and normalized institutional mechanism.

The “top leader” is the key to the “key minority” and shoulders the important political responsibility of governing the party. It should be more stringent on self-requirements and play a good role model. However, in practice, some “top leaders” do not abide by the supervision system of leading cadres, such as the system for requesting instructions and reporting on major matters, and the financial supervision system. There is a large subjective space in the implementation of the system, which leads to their use of personnel, decision-making, allocation and use of resources, etc. Lack of substantive constraints.

In the long-term practice of supervision within the party, supervision at the same level has been a “old problem.” Whether the supervision at the same level can be carried out normally is closely related to whether there is a serious inner-party political life. In practice, the quality of democratic life of some leading groups is not high, and members of the group dare not carry out real criticism and self-criticism, and there is a “good humanism” mentality. Some team members think that “in the same team, the supervision cannot save face, can not let go of their hands and feet”, and they are unwilling to be “iron bread”, and their awareness of active supervision is not strong. Some team members regard themselves as bystanders, thinking that supervision is a matter of the Commission for Discipline Inspection, while they “sit on the tower and watch the mountain view.” Some team members did not perform the “one post with two responsibilities” in place, thinking that they were engaged in business and did not work hard in party building.

As the agency responsible for supervision within the party, commissions for discipline inspection at all levels must strengthen the supervision of the party committees at the same level and consolidate the supervision of the lower-level party organizations, especially the “top leaders.” However, some commissions for discipline inspection have fear of supervising the members of the party committee at the same level, especially the “top leaders”, and lack of fighting spirit, and the supervision is not enough; some have fewer methods and measures to carry out supervision at the same level, and the problems of the team members cannot be accurately detected and timely. remind.

“The supervision of the’top leader’ and the supervision of the same level are linked.” In the interview, many people mentioned that all aspects of supervision cannot be done alone, especially the party committee (party group) and the discipline inspection committee should resonate and work together. , To promote the integrated implementation of main responsibility and supervision responsibility, and form a joint force of supervision.

See also  Police recover millionaire sum of money in Cali

The “Opinions” puts forward a series of practical and highly targeted measures

The “Opinions” formulated this time are based on upholding and improving the existing system, focusing on summarizing the party’s historical experience, further detailing and concretizing the relevant provisions of the party constitution and regulations, and elevating effective practices in practice to system standards, and supervising the cracking of the “top leader” The problem puts forward a series of practical measures that are both operability and pertinence.

The “Opinions” clearly stated that the supervision of the “top leaders” should be the top priority, the supervision and inspection should be strengthened, and the supervision of the “top leaders” should be taken as a main line throughout all parts of the article.

To strengthen the top-down supervision of the party organization, the “top leaders” at higher levels must grasp the “top leaders” at lower levels. This is the most effective and effective supervision. The “Opinions” emphasized that the “top leaders” at higher levels should supervise the situation of the “top leaders” at lower levels as the key content of the annual report; the newly appointed “top leaders” at lower levels should conduct appointment talks; and the regular supervisory talks with the “top leaders” at lower levels are likely to show signs of 2. Criticize and educate on tendentious issues, and promptly admonish those who have minor violations of discipline.

The party committee (party group) must fulfill its main responsibilities. The “Opinions” pointed out that the party committee (party group) should highlight the supervision of the “top leader” and make the “top leader” the focus of carrying out daily supervision and special supervision, so that the “top leader” always feels that the power is under supervision. The party committee (party group) strengthened supervision and inspection of the implementation of the system of comprehensive and strict governance of the party, the implementation of democratic centralism by the “top leaders” of the lower-level party committees (party groups), and the implementation of the “three important and one large” decision-making system; strengthened the subordinate party committees (party groups) The “top leader” supervises his thoughts, work, style, and living conditions by means of stationed surveys and special inspections.

Other members of the leadership team strengthened the supervision of the “top leaders”. The “Opinions” pointed out that if other members of the leadership team find that the “top leader” has important problems, they can directly report to the party organization at a higher level.

All supervision needs to focus on the “top leader” and use strong supervision to encourage the “top leader” to correctly use the power in their hands. The “Opinions” emphasized that strict implementation of the responsibility system for comprehensive and strict governance of the party, implementation of the responsibility of the first responsible person of the “top leader”; implementation of democratic centralism, perfecting the “three important and one large” decision-making supervision mechanism; inspection work must focus on the “top leader” , Discover problems in time; grasp the response to the “top leaders” in time, and establish and improve the system of reporting responsibility and honesty. Behind each system, the responsibilities of the relevant supervisory bodies are clearly listed, and the specific methods of supervision are clarified, which has very strong operability.

Give full play to the supervisory role of the discipline inspection agency. The “Opinions” stipulate 18 specific measures for disciplinary inspection agencies to perform their assistance and supervision responsibilities, and promote the consistent implementation of the main responsibility and supervision responsibility. For example, the “Opinions” stipulate that the disciplinary inspection agency should be a good assistant to the party committee (party group) and assist the members of the leadership team in fulfilling the “one post with two responsibilities”, clarifying that “the disciplinary inspection agency should organize implementation, supervise inspections, and propose rectification suggestions. Promote the first responsible person to earnestly perform their duties.”

To grasp the key point of “accountability”, the “Opinions” also stipulated 6 specific accountability content, emphasizing that the “top leader” shall be held accountable in accordance with regulations and disciplines such as non-accountability and omission of the first responsible person. Among them, it is specifically stipulated that if members of the leadership team discover that other members have violated disciplines and laws, they should be jointly and severally held accountable for concealing and not reporting, and being “good old men.”

The key to establishing rules depends on execution. Disciplinary inspection and supervision agencies at all levels must earnestly implement the requirements of the “Opinions”, give full play to the responsibilities of the party and the state supervision agency, and promote the linkage of the “two responsibilities”, so as to effectively supervise and manage the “key minorities” and promote comprehensive strictness. Party governance develops in depth. (Our reporter Wang Zhuo and Lu Lihuan)

.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Privacy & Cookies Policy