[Epoch Times November 03, 2021]The United Nations COP26 climate summit was held in the United Kingdom. Leaders of various countries have visited the scene in person. Xi Jinping was absent again and was not given the opportunity to speak in a video. White House National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan called the CCP “unsocial.” The CCP’s new round of climate promises reveals the bottom line, and the power outage and rationing farce should be played in vain.
On October 31, Biden stated that the CCP “basically made no promises to deal with climate change. People are forgiven for disappointment, and I feel disappointed myself.” The consequences of the disappointment of the leaders of various countries are also quite obvious. On November 1, Xi Jinping did not get the opportunity to speak in a video at the climate summit. Xinhua News Agency only reported that “Xi Jinping delivered a written address to the 26th Conference of the Parties to the World Leaders Summit of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.” The so-called “written speech” is actually a statement.
At the press conference of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Communist Party of China on November 2, a reporter deliberately asked: Why did the Chinese leaders only deliver written speeches at the climate summit instead of attending them via video connection? The spokesperson of the Chinese Communist Party’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Wang Wenbin, admitted that “the organizer of the conference did not provide a video method for attending the conference.”
This shows that the leaders of the Chinese Communist Party have lost their say in this climate summit. Since the CCP does not want to participate in meetings and wants to be an alternative, who is willing to patiently listen to the CCP’s slogans? On November 2nd, Xinhua News Agency really couldn’t justify it, so it had to review the report “The important proposition of President Xi of the G20 Rome Summit was widely praised.” Of course, the CCP did not dare to announce the embarrassing truth of being an alternative, so it had to repeat self-deprecating lies.
The G20 summit failed to achieve the goal of “achieving net zero emissions by 2050.” The CCP insists on “carbon peak by 2030” and “carbon neutrality by 2060”. It recently proposed that “by 2030, the proportion of non-fossil energy consumption will reach about 25%, and carbon dioxide emissions per unit of GDP will drop 65 percent from 2005. %above”. This should be far from the expectations of countries, but such a figure is actually difficult to achieve, and there was a farce of power cuts at the end of September.
The CCP once again played a trick on the international community, and even cut out and curtailed electricity in a meaningful way, which seriously affected the operation of the supply chain to prove that it is implementing carbon reduction measures. As a result, the leaders of the CCP did not participate in the two summits and did not have any real commitments. They were defined as “unsocialists.” The CCP’s extreme power cuts and rationing farce did cause concern, but the results were counterproductive.
The CCP has been happily playing similar tricks on the mainland, tossing up and down and fooling the people, but it is not seen in the international community. On October 26, Xi Jinping had a phone call with French President Macron. Macron urged the CCP to “announce the determined contribution to climate change” and “and the solid progress made to achieve the goal.” On October 29, Xi Jinping had a phone call with British Prime Minister Johnson. The United Kingdom only said that it “acknowledged” the CCP’s latest climate commitments. Britain and France should have never believed in the CCP’s blindfolds.
On November 1, White House National Security Adviser Sullivan said that China “is a big country”, “fully capable of fulfilling its responsibilities” and “it has nothing to do with the nature of US-China relations”; the CCP is an important “unsocialist.” .
On October 31, U.S. Secretary of State Blincoln met with Foreign Minister Wang Yi of the Communist Party of China. The US State Department’s statement stated that “emphasizes the importance of maintaining open communication channels to responsibly manage the competition between the United States and China (the Chinese Communist Party)”; “the areas where cooperation can be made include North Korea, Myanmar, Iran, Afghanistan, and the climate crisis.” .
In the limited areas of cooperation between China and the United States, the CCP should regard climate cooperation as a breakthrough, and it has had an alternative performance for more than a month. , Myanmar, Iran, Afghanistan”, it is even harder to see that the CCP is willing to cooperate with the United States. The differences between China and the United States are still clear. The statement of the US State Department expressed concern about the CCP’s “a series of actions that undermine the rules-based international order and violate the values and interests of us and our allies and partners, including human rights, Xinjiang, Tibet, and Hong Kong. , East China Sea, South China Sea and Taiwan”.
Wang Yi finally got the opportunity to meet alone with Brinken and resumed his war-wolf posture, saying that “the U.S. pursues a wrong China policy, which has caused a full impact on Sino-U.S. relations.” All kinds of small circles”, “clearly oppose this.” If Xi Jinping really attended the two summits, how embarrassing it might be.
Recently, the General Administration of Customs of the Communist Party of China stated that it will completely stop the issuance of GSP certificates of origin (Form A) for exports to the European Union, the United Kingdom, Canada, Turkey, Ukraine, and Liechtenstein from December 1, indirectly confirming that 32 countries including the European Union have cancelled China’s most-favored nation. treatment.
The isolation of the CCP has become more and more obvious. Regardless of economic and trade issues or climate issues, it has become a “unsocialist.” The CCP’s round of tricks on the climate issue should try to ease Sino-US and Sino-European relations before the Sixth Plenary Session of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, and create good diplomatic news. The result was self-defeating and was clearly classified as an alternative. If companies and ordinary people who have been manipulated by power outages know the truth, how will they feel?
——The Epoch Times debut
Editor in charge: Gao Yi#
.