[Epoch Times October 20, 2021]Hello, friends, my name is Yokogawa. Welcome everyone to the “Yokogawa View” channel. Today is Tuesday, October 19th.
Today’s focus: Investigate the bottom line of the Ou Jinzhong incident. Who is the evil force in the rural clan? What is the source of the homestead dispute? The Ministry of Public Security has thoroughly investigated Sun Lijun’s “political gang” and has a specific point?
Ou Jinzhong did not leave a living. The evil power of the rural clan was not “feudal dross”, but from the ruffian revolution. The source of disputes over rural homesteads was land reform and collectivization. Sympathy for Ou Jinzhong was a true manifestation of public opinion; the Ministry of Public Security determined that Sun Lijun’s “political gang” pointed to a specific The incident can be expected to be a major cleansing of personnel but the policy remains unchanged.
Pinghai Town offers a reward without leaving a living?
Ou Jinzhong committed suicide? If there is no previous reward announcement, it is not easy to infer. The Pinghai Town Government’s announcement is very clear, providing a clue award of 20,000 yuan, and finding a corpse award 50,000 yuan, which is obviously just saying not to stay alive. As for why, I’m afraid it’s not the previous inaction on this matter that can explain it. Maybe it will leave alive and it will affect many people. The incident itself has been discussed a lot, so I will not repeat it.
Who is the evil clan in the Ou Jinzhong case?
Let’s discuss it from two other angles: where is the root of the clan’s evil power and the homestead dispute.
1. Clan evil forces. It is said that it is the dregs of feudalism for thousands of years. This is not the case. The traditional Chinese squire autonomy has standards. Traditional cultural governance with Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism at its core is not common in oppressing the village.
Historical story: The CCP’s own website of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection once had a traditional culture column, which was the tradition and family education of the big family in the past; a virtuous circle: reading, becoming an official, returning to the hometown, teaching the hometown; I have seen it with my own eyes, and it was decentralized in 69 years. In 1949, the 20-year-old young man was only 40 years old. No one hated the landlord and rich peasants. During the land reform, wealth was lost. Many peasants sent back the things they got at night.
People in the village have never heard of oppression. In the south, such as Jiangxi, clan fights will occur, but in fact it has nothing to do with the clan, but is related to the grabbing of water between different villages. I have never heard of suffering What specific landlords oppress is all described as being poor.
The CCP’s own propaganda has been proven to be fake so far. Huang Shiren and Yang Bailao’s white-haired girl is fake, Sichuan’s Liu Wencai is fake, the rent collection house is fake, and the rooster barking in the middle of the night is fake. How difficult.
Why did Lin Biao engage in a new-style military reorganization in the Northeast? It is that the vast majority of recruits have no personal experience of being oppressed and need to make up stories to inspire class hatred. Not in the past does not mean that there is no one now. Many places are now evil forces. There are clan-like and clan-like ones. Why is there now?
The real landlord and country gentry have been wiped out, together with the culture they inherited, and the CCP’s land reform initiated and relied on the ruffians. It was delicious and lazy, and the construction was not enough to destroy. The bad guys were in charge, passed down from generation to generation, and the village tyrants were mostly supported by the grassroots government. , At least sympathy, after all, they are the same kind of people.
When I was in the countryside, the bullies were the village officials. It’s just that certain areas are expressed in the form of clans, and the essence is that the grassroots organizations of the Chinese Communist Party themselves are bullies.
The contradiction of rural housing land comes from land reform and collectivization
2. Vicious homicide cases always need to find the root cause. On the surface, this is a question of homestead ownership or division, but whose problem is the homestead? There has been no such problem in Chinese history, because land ownership, land has title deeds, and housing has title deeds, are private property that is legally recognized and protected. The boundaries of the land are described very clearly and unambiguously, just like buying a house in the United States now, it includes land. Yes, the boundary between the land around the house and the neighbors is very clear.
The problem lies in two major issues. One is the land reform, which divides the land that the landlord and rich peasants have worked so hard to save. The land is robbed, which is originally illegal; the other is collectivization. From the cooperative to the people’s commune, the landlord is deprived first. , Then deprive farmers, farmers do not own their own farming and living land, land is shared.
The problem is that publicly owned land, including homesteads, is not really publicly owned, but is managed by others. This escrow is the grassroots government of the CCP. The basis is the “Land Management Law” and “Property Law” of the Communist Party of China. In other words, the homestead for building houses in rural areas is approved by the government.
The first paragraph of Article 14 of the Land Administration Law stipulates: “Disputes on land ownership and use rights shall be resolved by the parties through negotiation; if the negotiation fails, the people’s government shall deal with it.” Ou Jinzhong was obviously approved, but a dispute occurred and the negotiation failed. , The government did not deal with it. The responsibility is not in Eugene.
The government approval itself also has serious problems. With the power to approve homesteads, there are opportunities for corruption and bias. In the final analysis, it is still a problem of land and housing ownership. If this problem is not resolved, the contradiction will always exist and worsen.
European case sparks public opinion
3. Ou Jinzhong disputes with neighbors and netizens. The issue here is very complicated. I tend not to believe the news from the government and official media. At least the stories about saving children and dolphins from Ou Jin from the people are much more authentic, especially the children who were rescued have come forward to confirm.
Of course, people will not be perfect, and they will not be black and white, but Ou Jinzhong turned out to be a good man. He failed to build the house after he was approved. He still tried to appeal and reason for at least 5 years.
The folks on the Internet fell to the ground to sympathize with him, indicating that many people feel the same to varying degrees. Being suppressed and bullied is unreasonable. This is not because CCTV “violence should not be encouraged nor praised” or Hu Xijin said he was “condemned by the whole society”. It should be unconditional” to be able to change. This is an explosion of public opinion.
Purging Sun Lijun’s “political gang” will not correct the unjust cases
The Ministry of Public Security of the Communist Party of China held a meeting on the 16th. Zhao Kezhi stated that he “deeply investigated clues about participating in Sun Lijun’s political gangs, and severely punished those who did not take the initiative to explain the problem.” This is no longer about general gangs that fell before, but clear political gangs. .
This is a specific organization, not a general group with the same views and interests. Although Mao once said that “there is a party outside the party, there are factions within the party”, but the CCP never shows mercy to what is actually formed within the party, and basically kills it. , Such as AB group, Trotskyist, Gaogang, etc., whether it is true or not.
Since the establishment of the CCP’s regime, few people have been truly organized. The rightists are basically imposed and have no organization at all. Hu Feng said that the clique is also a fake. The May 16 clique during the Cultural Revolution can be compared. It seems that there is such a thing, of course it has been exaggerated too much.
The two extreme leftist groups of the Cultural Revolution: Lin Biao and the Gang of Four did not form a group by themselves, they were only Mao Zedong’s thugs, but Lin Liguo created a small anti-Mao group, and it was only one that was conscious. So this political group might really be an organization, so it needs to be cleaned up.
A review article on Duowei.com stated on the 18th that Zhao Kezhi’s statement on the occasion clearly conveyed the message that the rectification will be focused on the Sun Lijun case, and the handling of it will be directed to related individuals and specific cases.
This means that some controversial and important cases that Sun Lijun has handled, and the members of the “gang” who have been wooed, will be strictly scrutinized and passed one by one.
Especially in the units and fields that Sun Lijun was in charge of, the cases in which he was responsible or intervened will be investigated one by one, and the rectification and reformation will be in place. The domestic security system, anti-cult system, and Hong Kong-related and Macao-related departments that Sun Lijun has been responsible for for a long time will be the focus of the inventory and rectification.
Thorough investigation and direct to the background
I think there are a few things to watch here, 1) This organization, mainly in the Ministry of Public Security, is organized to complete specific tasks, and there should be a list;
2) It is not what Sun Lijun wants to accomplish. As the fifth deputy minister of the Ministry of Public Security, he is too far away from acquiring the highest power. China cannot be like the countries in the Middle East and Africa. It is impossible for any major lieutenant colonel to succeed in a coup and become its leader. , So there is really organization and goal, he is just an executor;
3) Even his original boss Meng Jianzhu will not be the last backstage, although it may be implicated. Meng was only a member of the Politburo, and he did not see any political ambitions and capabilities;
4) It can no longer be explained simply by ensuring the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China. It should be that a specific event that is likely to be directed at Xi Jinping has already occurred, so the good show is still to come;
Moreover, the controversial and major cases handled by Sun Lijun are generally not moved. Even if they are re-examined internally, the possibility of overturning is extremely small, and the CCP has rarely rehabilitated what they have done after the fall.
However, his political gang within the Ministry of Public Security is likely to be purged, that is, the National Security Agency, the 610 Office and the Hong Kong and Macao Affairs Office. It happens to be a department with a lot of blood debts and people’s indignation. Again, the policy will not change, but the people are optimistic that it will suffer.
The above is the content of our program today. If you like my show, please don’t forget to like, subscribe, and help us forward this channel so that more people can see it. Due to the cessation of profitability on youtube, for the long-term consideration of channel management, next month I will make a show on the youlucky membership website. I hope everyone will subscribe to support then. At the same time, I will meet you once a week on YouTube. Thank you for your help and watching. See you next time.
“Yokogawa View” Production Team
Editor in charge: Li Hao#
.