The new municipal regulation prohibits prostitution, but extends to more or less inappropriate clothing and attitudes to keep on the street. So in Cassina de ‘Pecchi, in the Milanese area, the’ brawl of the miniskirt ‘explodes and takes center stage. A “shameful and sterile” controversy for the municipal administration. But the case mounts, and a garrison is already on schedule: “The witch hunt is back”. Needless to say, it will be held on Friday evening under the council chamber, where the discussion on the Urban Police regulation in the center is scheduled, …
The new municipal regulation prohibits prostitution, ma widens on clothing and more or less inappropriate attitudes to keep in the street. So a Cassina de ‘Pecchi, in the Milanese area, it explodes and holds the stage ‘brawl of the miniskirt’. A “shameful and sterile” controversy for the municipal administration. But the case mounts, and a garrison is already on schedule: “The witch hunt is back”. It will be held, needless to say, on Friday evening in the council chamber, where the discussion on the Urban Police regulation at the center, for 48 hours, of this pandemonium. The brand new article 23 was targeted, which filled a gap in the old regulation, which provided nothing with respect to the problem of prostitution in the municipal area. Everything ok in the first part: “It is forbidden to contract or agree on sexual services or entertain with subjects who carry out prostitution activities on the street”.
But in the following there is the catch. We speak verbatim of “subjects who, by attitude, that is for clothing, or for the behavioral modalities they manifest in any case the intention to carry out the activity consisting in sexual performance“. The first excerpts circulated unofficially were enough to set fire to the dust. Also because the climate was already hot due to a controversy unleashed only a week ago by the highly criticized post by a councilor on the subject of catcalling.
It is impossible to select the hundreds of comments that have appeared on the net: “So one risks being fined if he stops talking to a woman in miniskirt, top and heel 12? “.” Why don’t you go beyond all limits and also write down what are the clothes that demonstrate the intention to ‘exercise’? “.” We are returned to the Middle Ages“. There is no lack of those who oppose:” It is clear that we only want to limit prostitution and not the freedom to dress: a meaningless controversy “.
“Shameful, ignoble and sterile“the reaction for the Mayor Elisa Balconi, leader of a center-right junta: “Our aim is one: to acknowledge what is already law in Italy, that is the ban on exploiting and / or promoting prostitution. Male and female. No one has ever talked about miniskirts or feminine clothes to be banned. Every woman, like every man, can circulate dressed, or dress, as you like“. Another opinion for the dem secretary and minority councilor, Doriana Marangoni:” The blunder on the councilor’s catcalling, then this regulation. There is a background that worries us. What need was there to talk about attitudes or clothing? “. On the regulation:” We also have a doubt about its constitutionality: in a state of law one cannot review attitudes or intentions “.
© All rights reserved