Home » Udinese got stuck on the most beautiful: what the fans think and what are the hopes for the Zebrette

Udinese got stuck on the most beautiful: what the fans think and what are the hopes for the Zebrette

by admin

There are those who indicate Udinese’s problem in the form and those who see in the lack of alternatives the crux of the issue that prevents Gotti from letting the team play in another way. The fans “split” into two very distinct factions and the argument holds court for those who care about the fate of the Zebretta. Most of the people we interviewed, who inevitably are a very small sample, argue that the problem lies in the lack of alternatives and point the finger at the performance of the various Llorente, Okaka and Nestorovski.

Samuel Rossi he is particularly strict with the players and the work of the club. «In my opinion the team is expressing the maximum of its possibilities. Having Nestorovski play and getting Pereyra back to midfield wouldn’t change our lives. The problem, if anything, are the absences of Pussetto and Deulofeu. I don’t see great responsibilities on the part of the coach. Gotti is a good coach, the right one for the target of a club like Udinese. He valued Molina, Pereyra held a high yield and De Paul definitely exploded under his leadership. We will finish this championship like the last ones, perhaps something more could have been done, but not on the part of the coach ».

The comment by Tobia De Franceschi pointing his finger at the tips made available to Gotti: «The problem is not the module but the alternatives. Llorente was a great player, but he’s not what he used to be. Okaka has always disappointed since he was in Udine and I don’t think that with Nestorovski the music can change. If anything, Pussetto’s injury weighs heavily. I Gotti absolutely do not question him, he is a serious person, prepared and with charisma. I would confirm it immediately ».

See also  Honduras and Panama See Positive Shifts in FIFA Ranking after Gold Cup 2023

The president of the AUC Bepi Marcon asks for a change of form: “Given that it is not easy to answer this question – its introduction -, I say that given the little that the strikers are giving in the last few games, I would favor the 4-2-3-1 which is what I have been invoking since the beginning of the season. I would put Pereyra, De Paul and Forestieri or Braaf behind the first striker ». Ernesto Bozzo he agrees: «Thanks to the injuries of Pussetto and Deulofeu, the alternatives are scarce, but in this way Llorente is too isolated. I would approach De Paul and place him on the trocar with Pereyra where he can affect more. Today’s Udinese is not what Gotti proposed to us in the post lockdown a year ago. I understand that there are players on whom it is difficult to rely, Okaka above all, but the coach is too rigid in his convictions ». Pino Barile he feels “betrayed” by some players: «Okaka has never convinced, Llorente himself is not doing well. The tips are not up to par with the rest of the rose. And the injuries of Pussetto and Deulofeu weigh heavily. Braaf? It is immature. Maybe I would get closer to the opponent De Paul area ».

Final for Alessandro Scarbolo, vice president of the Autonomous clubs: «I blame the coach a few and a lot of the players. With the Torino 22 you only shoot 2 in the mirror. And in any case, let’s not forget that since the beginning of the year, due to various vicissitudes, Gotti has had to change the attacking couple three times. It’s not easy to work like this for a coach ».

See also  Price of 16 million and high wage: the Simeone wagon already on the siding

.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Privacy & Cookies Policy