Home » Macron divides NATO and the EU over the sending of troops to Ukraine. USA and Stoltenberg against. Chigi: “Hypothesis not contemplated”

Macron divides NATO and the EU over the sending of troops to Ukraine. USA and Stoltenberg against. Chigi: “Hypothesis not contemplated”

by admin
Macron divides NATO and the EU over the sending of troops to Ukraine.  USA and Stoltenberg against.  Chigi: “Hypothesis not contemplated”

A single sentence of Emmanuel Macron during Paris summitwhat some have renamed the counter-G7, on the war in Ukraine it managed to split in two Europe and the Nato. In his speech, in the presence of the leaders of the Alliance and of Volodymyr Zelenskylinked from Kievthe French president said that there is currently no agreement in this sense, but that a ground intervention of the troops of the Atlantic Pact cannot be excluded. Words that have provoked in some countries, such as Slovakialukewarm reactions. Robert Fico, while excluding his country’s involvement, in fact said that others are evaluating whether to conclude bilateral agreements to send troops. On the other hand there is the firm opposition of countries such as United States, Germania and also Italiain addition to that of the Secretary General of NATO, Jens Stoltenberg. With the Russia who warned: “If this were so, war would be inevitable“.

It is no coincidence, perhaps, that the new French prime minister, Gabriel Attal, intervened to explain the president’s words: “Nothing can be ruled out in a war that takes place in the heart of Europe and at the gates of the European Union”, he said, echoing the head of state’s statement. Clarifications also come from the Elysée: “The possible future presence of Western troops in Ukraine would not go beyond threshold of belligerence“. This was learned from Elysée sources. But Macron’s provocation did not garner great consensus among the various leaders, as the Polish president also says, Andrzej Duda: “The most heated discussion took place around the issue of sending soldiers to Ukraine. And here too there was absolutely no agreement.” From “good signal” on Macron’s part, he speaks instead, the Ukrainian presidency. “It’s a good sign,” the Ukrainian presidential adviser said Mykhailo Podolyak. While recognizing that this option for the moment is “only one proposal of discussion”, he added that “the French president’s statement clearly brings the discussion on another level“.

See also  Cagliari-Udinese / The referee for Sunday's match has been decided: the precedents

Totally contrary to White House, still convinced that direct NATO involvement should be avoided. An official told Reuters that the United States has no intention of sending troops to fight in Ukraine. Secretary General Stoltenberg is of the same opinion: “NATO allies are providing unprecedented support to Ukraine. We have been doing this since 2014 and intensified it after the large-scale invasion. But there are no plans for NATO combat troops on the ground in Ukraine.” The European Unionfor his part, is keen to point out that if a sending of troops were to materialise, this was not decided upon Bruxelles: “We are aware of public statements by some member states that sending ground troops to Ukraine could be considered,” said the EU foreign policy spokesperson. Peter Stano – This has not been discussed at EU level. The EU policies in the European Council conclusions speak very clearly. The EU is committed to supporting Ukraine and will do everything possible. As for the form and manner of national contributions, they are a prerogative of the sovereignty and competence of each member state”.

Even the German Chancellor, Olaf Scholz, espouses the American line, guaranteeing that “no soldiers” will be sent to Ukraine by European or NATO countries: “What was decided between us from the beginning continues to be valid for the future, there will be no troops on the ground, nor soldiers sent by European states or NATO states to Ukrainian soil.” The government of Rome is also against it: in a note, Palazzo Chigi explains that “the Conference organized yesterday in Paris by President Macron was the opportunity to reaffirm, with the participation of the Vice Minister Cirielli, Italy’s full commitment to supporting Ukraine in the fight to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity. Since the Russian aggression two years ago there has been full cohesion of all the Allies in the support they have offered to Kiev. This support does not include the presence of troops from European states or NATO on Ukrainian territory.” Even the Italian foreign minister, Antonio Tajani: “AND an idea from Macron“, but “when we talk about sending troops we must be very cautious because we must not make people think that we are at war with Russia. We are not at war with Russia, we defend” Ukraine “and in my personal opinion I am not in favor of sending Italian troops to fight in Ukraine”. The United Kingdom However, he has no intention of sending soldiers to Ukraine.”on a large scale“. A clarification, that of the prime minister Rishi Sunaknecessary given that the country already has “a small number of personnel sent to assist the Ukrainian armed forces, including military medical instructors”.

See also  Haiti, former soldiers in the jungle: who are the Colombians who killed President Moïse

The Swedish Prime Minister also agrees, Ulf Kristersson, about to join the Alliance as the 32nd member country, which has for now ruled out sending troops to Ukraine, stating that it is not a relevant issue for NATO. In an interview with the Swedish public broadcaster SVTKristersson said: “We are currently busy sending advanced equipment to Ukraine in several ways,” adding that there is “no demand” from the Ukrainian side for troops, so the “issue is not current.”

Faced with the statements of theElysium, Russia promptly sent its warning that a ground intervention “would not be in the interests” of the West. Putin’s spokesman Dmitry Peskovdeclared that a direct military conflict between NATO and Russia would be “inevitable” if soldiers from Western countries were to be sent to Ukraine: “In this case, we must talk not about probability, but about inevitability, and this is how we evaluate it ”.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Privacy & Cookies Policy