Recently, Tesla owner @ID_韩 Chao issued a long article stating, “It took 755 days to defend the rights, and I won the case. The Beijing Second Intermediate Court upheld the original verdict of the first instance. Tesla was fraudulent, rejected the appeal, and refunded one compensation and three compensations.” A few days ago, the owner of Tesla’s “refund of one compensation for three cases”, Han Chao, posted on Weibo that he was sued by Tesla for infringement of his right of reputation.
According to the indictment issued by Han Chao,The plaintiff (Tesla) stated that the defendant (Mr. Han) should immediately stop all acts of the infringing plaintiff’s reputation rights and delete the content published on the social platform. The defendant apologized to the plaintiff in the top position of the social platform for 30 consecutive days. The defendant compensated the plaintiff for economic losses of 5 million yuan, and the defendant assumed the plaintiff’s reasonable rights protection support of 50,000 yuan due to the infringement, totaling 5.05 million yuan.
It is reported that the lawsuit has been accepted, and there is no definite news about the exact time of the court session. We will continue to pay attention to it.
Regarding Tesla’s accusation of infringing reputation rights, the owner Han Chao said that Tesla’s fraud has been established and the court has lost the lawsuit. This is already an established fact, “I said that you are a rogue? , Is not a rogue?”, “I said you are a gangster. Is there a problem? You lose the first instance, the second instance, and the fraud will continue to the end. What is this not a gangster?”, “Have you lied in the court? It can’t be counted, I have evidence, this is nothing! Liars, fraudulent companies are not liars? I’m not the one who was deceived? Hasn’t it been confirmed in accordance with the law?”
Han Chao even thought that Tesla’s claim of more than 5 million yuan was nonsense.“That’s it? Want more than 5 million? I want to be crazy about money!”, “Do you mean that although I cheated you, although I should pay you more than 1 million, although you are a victim, you can’t say I’m not good, just say that I’m not good, you have to pay five or six million!”
It is understood that Mr. Han, the Tesla owner, previously stated that he purchased a Tesla officially certified second-hand car Model S P85 on Tesla’s official website. Fire and structural damage, etc.
However, Mr. Han always found some minor problems in the car afterwards, and he needed to go to the Tesla service center frequently for repairs, and then passed a third-party inspection. The C-pillar and rear fender of the vehicle were cut and welded. Sla.
The result of the first-instance judgment in 2020 is that Tesla needs to “refund one and pay three” to the owner, but Tesla is not satisfied with the result of the judgment and chooses to appeal. On September 17, 2021, the owner of the car issued a Weibo stating that “the second-instance judgment was that Tesla was fraudulent, and Tesla’s appeal was rejected and the original verdict was upheld.” This also means that Tesla will face a “refund of one compensation”. Three” result.
Regarding the victory of the Tesla owner Mr. Han, many netizens left messages on his Weibo: Justice will never be absent, but will only be late. Congratulations, Tesla refunded one compensation to three, and it was not easy to maintain the original verdict in the second instance. Congratulations, this is a great victory. Despite the twists and turns, justice has finally arrived.
.