Panelist Sergio “Tronco” Figliuolo starred in a new controversial moment of viral fury when he showed indignation against the deputy of Unión por la Patria, Natalia Zaracho, who acknowledged in the debate of the Omnibus Law in the Chamber of Deputies that he did not read the entire project. “You have had the law there for 20 days! How did you not read it?” Figliuolo exclaimed between jumps and bangs on the desk.
In Tuesday’s session, the representative known for being the first cartonera to have a seat in the Legislative Branch consulted about the declaration of public emergency in social matters. “I wanted to talk about article 210, which has to do with the Secretariat of Social and Urban Integration. They are going to defund this policy, affecting 1,200 popular neighborhoods. I know that this doesn’t matter to everyone because they don’t know and talk about a place of comfort, with a full belly. But Do you know what it’s like to live in a place where there is no electricity or sewers, where ambulances don’t enter?“, the deputy consulted the ministers.
“It is important to discuss how they are looting us. What I want to ask is if they are going to finance that. And today—because we didn’t have much time to read everything— Did you see how much of a good person you can be? Well, you can also be a bad person. They want to finance these policies by charging those who go to protest. It is a joke? Is that what they call being good people? Because I prefer to be on this side,” Zaracho questioned. The moment in which he acknowledges that “we didn’t have much time to read everything” was cut out and broadcast on the air of NervesAlejandro Fantino’s streaming, during the program Humo Industrial.
“You have had the law there for 20 days, 20 days, 20 days!”Figliuolo began to shout, generating laughter among his colleagues, so he asked to retransmit the clip of the deputy. “20 days, 400 sheets in 20 days, how did you not have time?”Fantino’s friend shouted. “20 days is nothing, it should be 100 days,” said another panelist ironically. “’We didn’t have time to read,’ he says, damn it!”Figliuolo insisted, to which her colleagues disqualified the legislator saying that “she has priorities”, remembering that Zaracho recently starred in two episodes for which she was criticized: trying to break up a fight in a women’s soccer match and being arrested by the police, despite their jurisdiction, while intervening in the detention of a minor under 14 years of age to prevent him from being beaten.
Sergio “Tronco” Figliuolo hit a PVC pipe on which he had drawn the face of Nicolás de Caño
A member of the table offered an analysis: “A representative has to read, you can’t say that. The people voted for these people, saying that when you have five minutes is a nonsense. It speaks of the lack of professionalism, suitability and improvisation that exists on the premises. It’s not something that happens now, it always happens in Argentina. They go from deputy to Minister of Agriculture, to Chief of Staff, to Chancellor and then back to Deputies. There is no race, they don’t know what the circuits are like. This happens in all political parties.”said panelist Malena de los Ríos, until being interrupted by the next controversial moment of the program, when They drew a deputy from the Left Front on a PVC pipe.
“Let’s see how we should react to someone who doesn’t follow the rules. At the meeting everyone had to speak for five minutes to ask questions. That’s why I’m here with Nicholas of PVC“But it’s the same because it’s hollow,” said Figliuolo in reference to Del Caño and his encounter with José Luis Espert, while he was asking the Minister of the Interior, Guillermo Francos, and the president of the commission closed the microphone for exceeding the assigned period. With the pipe on a chair in the studio Nerveswhile the legislator’s speech sounded, the panelist entered the scene kicking the face he had drawn. The violent episode went viral on social networks.
Benegas Lynch also criticized Zaracho and Grabois treated him as an “infamous little ruffian.”
Due to the same episode of the Unión por la Patria deputy, when she admitted not having read the complete Omnibus Law, she entered the debate Joaquin Benegas Lynch, brother of Alberto “Bertie” Benegas Lynch and also leader of La Libertad Avanza. On X (formerly Twitter), the son of Alberto Benegas Lynch shared a criticism of the legislator along with the message: “How does this woman become a deputy? A person who says that she doesn’t have time to do her job. We call this caste. So much talent and capacity from the private sector loose and available. “Those who can should get involved to change the policy.”
Juan Grabois, who militates in the same space as Zaracho, came out to defend her by claiming that it was effectively a few days to understand the magnitude of changes proposed by the Executive Branch, and called him “hypocritical” and “aporophobic”, that is, discriminating against people from popular classes. “Infamous, aporophobic and hypocritical little ruffian: you know perfectly well that except for some specialized technicians, no one read the articles of the law in their entirety. You shouldn’t understand even 10% of the Russian salad they put together“, began his defense, also on the same social network.
“Natalia is sincere and says it, while she expresses herself on the issues that she does know. She has a wisdom and kindness that is good for democracy. Something that little pituquitos like you will never understand“he added.”It is eloquent that you call a congresswoman who lives humbly in a popular neighborhood and has worked since she was nine years old. to earn his bread, who knows what the life of the people is and does not speak from the arrogance of the double surname. That is caste for you: the workers and the humble. The good people are the Benegas-Lynch, Bullrich Luro de Puyredón and Etchevehere. In addition to being a bad guy, you are a cotillion aristocrat. Get well. You can’t keep up with Nati,” she concluded.
ML / ED