Home » Chiara Ferragni investigated for aggravated fraud, Myrta Merlino responds to Fedez: “Our duty to inform”

Chiara Ferragni investigated for aggravated fraud, Myrta Merlino responds to Fedez: “Our duty to inform”

by admin

The back and forth continues between
Myrta Merlino e
Fedez. In the episode of January 10th the presenter of ”
Afternoon Five” he goes back to talking about
Chiara Ferragniinvestigated for aggravated fraud for the sale of pandoro ‘Pink Christmas’ sold by Balocco, and responds to Fedez who criticized the presence of journalists near his home. ”
Fedez’s words show a certain intolerance and frankly I find it understandable from a human point of view; it’s not an easy time for him and his wife, “so Merlino a
Channel 5.

Fedez’s accusations on Instagram – “In my opinion there were fewer people outside Matteo Messina Denaro’s house, look at them… Oh my God, the priorities of Italian information and the country…”. Chiara Ferragni’s husband thus commented on the media attention on the case involving his wife and shortly after addressed Myrta Merlino directly who has been following the story with the correspondent for some time
Michel Dessì who for days, having been stationed outside the Ferragnez condominium, hopes to meet some of the protagonists of the story, but who at the moment has only met Paloma, the couple’s dog. Hence the rapper’s provocation: “The only thing you can find under my house is my dog ​​doing the shit. Have you by chance been under the house of the former deputy Pozzolo, kicked out by his own government for shooting and used parliamentary immunity to not do the gunpowder test?”.

Myrta Merlino’s reply – “Fedez’s words show a certain intolerance and frankly I find it understandable from a human point of view – declares the journalist who adds – it is not an easy moment for him and his wife. But we must start from the facts, his wife, Chiara Ferragni a well-known businesswoman, was investigated for fraud and
I think it’s our duty to talk about it. Personally, I hope that you can demonstrate that you are not involved in the facts, but it remains our duty to inform on issues which from a social, economic, and I would also say judicial point of view, are of no small importance”.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Privacy & Cookies Policy