Home » Banks: conflict impact does not threaten stability, solid positions and liquidity. But possible indirect risks

Banks: conflict impact does not threaten stability, solid positions and liquidity. But possible indirect risks

by admin
Banks: conflict impact does not threaten stability, solid positions and liquidity.  But possible indirect risks
  1. Home ››
  2. News >>
  3. World News ››


FACEBOOK
TWITTER
LINKEDIN

The first-impact risks deriving from the Russia-Ukraine conflict, that is, deriving from exposures and market risk, do not represent a threat to the stability of the EU banking system, but the second-round effects could be more significant. This is the opinion expressed by the European Banking Authority (Eba).

The report found that European banks’ capital and liquidity ratios remained solid, profitability stabilized at higher levels than in the pre-pandemic period, and non-performing loan (NPL) ratios declined as asset quality continued to decline. to improve.

The EBA also notes that direct exposures to Russia, Belarus and Ukraine are limited, albeit with differences between countries. French, Italian and Austrian banks recorded the highest volume of exposures to Russian counterparties, while Austrian, French and Hungarian banks were those with the greatest exposure to Ukraine.

However, the EBA warns, second-round effects could be more relevant from a financial stability perspective. These are risks to profitability, asset quality, operational, market, liquidity and financing risks. Finally, the risks associated with cybernetics and information and communication technologies (ICT) remain high.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Privacy & Cookies Policy