Home » Government is re-examining Cosco’s entry into the port of Hamburg

Government is re-examining Cosco’s entry into the port of Hamburg

by admin
Government is re-examining Cosco’s entry into the port of Hamburg
Business critical infrastructure

Government is re-examining Cosco’s entry into the port of Hamburg

Tollerort is the smallest terminal at the Port of Hamburg

Tollerort is the smallest terminal at the Port of Hamburg

Source: dpa/Christian Charisius

You can listen to our WELT podcasts here

In order to display embedded content, your revocable consent to the transmission and processing of personal data is required, since the providers of the embedded content as third-party providers require this consent [In diesem Zusammenhang können auch Nutzungsprofile (u.a. auf Basis von Cookie-IDs) gebildet und angereichert werden, auch außerhalb des EWR]. By setting the switch to “on”, you agree to this (which can be revoked at any time). This also includes your consent to the transfer of certain personal data to third countries, including the USA, in accordance with Art. 49 (1) (a) GDPR. You can find more information about this. You can withdraw your consent at any time via the switch and via privacy at the bottom of the page.

The federal agency responsible has classified the container terminal, into which the Chinese state shipping company Cosco wants to enter, as critical infrastructure. The federal government is now examining whether this will affect the takeover.

Dhe Federal Office for Information Security (BSI) has now classified the container terminal at Tollerort as a critical infrastructure. This was announced by a spokeswoman for Hamburger Hafen und Logistik AG on Wednesday after a corresponding report by the “Süddeutsche Zeitung”, NDR and WDR. According to the Ministry of Economic Affairs, the federal government is therefore again examining the entry of the Chinese state shipping company Cosco into the operating company. A government spokeswoman pointed out that Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s position on the subject had not changed.

See also  Subsidies: Germany should rather strengthen its key industries

On October 26, the federal cabinet issued a so-called partial ban, which means that Cosco can only take over 24.9 percent of the operating company at Hamburg’s smallest container terminal, Tollerort. The Chancellery had spoken out in favor of this minority participation, the ministries led by the Greens and FDP had rejected this at the time, but had to give in. At that time, Tollerort had not yet been classified as part of the critical infrastructure.

On Wednesday, it was initially unclear why the BSI now judges this differently and what the consequences are. Despite the cabinet decision in October to April, the green-led Ministry of Economics had not yet given any final confirmation for Cosco’s entry. Because the legal situation has now changed, you have to check again, said the spokeswoman for the ministry. However, she did not want to make a statement about the outcome of the test. It will now be checked again whether there is a danger to public order and security. Chancellor Scholz did not see them in October.

also read

Tentative criticism, or clear edge?  In the federal government there is no real consensus on the position towards China

Greens and FDP call on the federal government to be critical of the upcoming test. Green parliamentary group leader Katharina Dröge told the German press agency with regard to the classification as critical infrastructure: “The federal government should take this new assessment as an opportunity to once again very critically review Cosco’s participation in the port of Hamburg. Cosco’s participation in the Port of Hamburg is a mistake.”

Critical infrastructure must be protected, says Dröge. “Especially here we must not make ourselves dependent on authoritarian states and open to blackmail. This endangers our security and sovereignty and ultimately also harms the German economy.”

See also  Monika Schnitzer suggests 1.5 million immigrants per year

The Hamburg FDP energy politician Michael Kruse said that the classification made a renewed review of Chinese state participation “inevitable”. “Chancellor Olaf Scholz, who, together with Hamburg’s Mayor Peter Tschentscher, was very committed to this participation, must now clarify why the assessments from the BSI under the supervision of the SPD-led Ministry of the Interior were not available earlier and have obviously not been included in the federal government’s decision-making process have flowed in,” says Kruse.

You can listen to our WELT podcasts here

In order to display embedded content, your revocable consent to the transmission and processing of personal data is required, since the providers of the embedded content as third-party providers require this consent [In diesem Zusammenhang können auch Nutzungsprofile (u.a. auf Basis von Cookie-IDs) gebildet und angereichert werden, auch außerhalb des EWR]. By setting the switch to “on”, you agree to this (which can be revoked at any time). This also includes your consent to the transfer of certain personal data to third countries, including the USA, in accordance with Art. 49 (1) (a) GDPR. You can find more information about this. You can withdraw your consent at any time via the switch and via privacy at the bottom of the page.

“Everything on shares” is the daily stock exchange shot from the WELT business editorial team. Every morning from 5 a.m. with the financial journalists from WELT. For stock market experts and beginners. Subscribe to the podcast at Spotify, Apple Podcast, Amazon Music and Deezer. Or directly by RSS-Feed.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Privacy & Cookies Policy