The national representative of Libertad Avanza, Alberto āBertieā Benegas Lynch, stated this Sunday that he does not believe in compulsory education, while he questioned the interference that the State exercises over families. He also suggested that those who do not have the āluxury of sending their child to schoolā could put minors to work. His statements generated criticism from across the opposition.
āI donāt believe in compulsory education.. It is a responsibility of the parents. āYou want to give your son the best,ā Benegas Lynch said in an interview with Romina Lack in FM Millennium 106.7. Along these lines, the legislator, representative of the province of Buenos Aires, added: āMany times it can happen on the ranch, and especially in Argentina, which You cannot afford to send your son to school because you need him in the workshop with his father working. and you canāt send him to university.ā
The Government promotes the increase of the minimum Income Tax and promises that there will be no retroactive effects
āHow is the State going to be the one to decide about the boy? āI canāt even think of a more invasive thing,ā said the pro-government legislator who arrived in the Chamber of Deputies last December. Despite supporting this discursive line, Benegas Lynch added: āEducation is the axis of civilization. How can you think of giving a committee of bureaucrats the decision about education? To the State? āTo the Ministry of Education?ā
For Benegas Lynch, āwhat a family is supposed to doā is that they bring āa child into the world to educate him, to protect him, to make him a better person, and to change the world.ā āSo, how does it occur to you that the bureaucrat of a government house is going to have better intentions? Is he going to say what people have to do?ā He added and closed: āI believe in the individualI believe in the decisions we make in our lives, and I believe that The State is alone to protect individual rights and administer justiceā.
Criticism from the entire opposition arch: Macristas, Peronists, radicals and the left against Benegas Lynch
Various leaders referred to the controversial statements of the libertarian deputy to reject his position regarding education. One of them was Pablo AvellutoSecretary of the Government of Culture of the Nation during the presidency of Mauricio Macri, who on his X account (formerly Twitter) repudiated: āThe freedom to be ignorant. āThe freedom of being an ignorant deputyā.
Avelluto then postulated that āIn the future we will remember this time with shame for not having done more to prevent it from happeningā and, finally, he said: āMy dad had to start working when he was 8 years old. Born in 1938 and the only son of a single mother, there was no alternative at home. Sadly, he passed away many years ago. If I were alive, I would go trumpet the ignorant deputy to tell him what child labor is all about.ā.
The former executive director of PAMI, also during the presidency of Mauricio Macri, Carlos Javier Regazzonijoined the criticism: āCompulsory education. The world of children without compulsory schooling and without public education is not freedomā, he pointed out and attached an image from 1911 that shows dozens of minors and infants working in a coal mine, in Pennsylvania, United States.
Daniel Filmus, Minister of Science, Technology and Innovation of the Nation under Alberto FernĆ”ndez, analyzed: āB. Lynch explains why they are against compulsory education and in favor of child labor: āThey canāt afford to go to school because they have to be in the workshop with their father.ā Does he know that it was JA Roca who imposed 1420?ā, he said in reference to the law that establishes common, free and compulsory primary education.
Maximiliano Ferraro, president of the ARI Civic Coalition and national deputy, also reacted to the libertarianās statement on social networks, with a text titled āNot with the boys.ā āDeputy Benegas Lynch, Law 26,390 prohibits child labor in Argentina. The National Constitution has incorporated various international conventions that protect the rights of children, including the right not to be exploited and the right to education. His position goes back 140 years, since Law 1420 was sanctioned in 1884ā, he highlighted.
āNicolĆ”s Avellaneda, Julio Argentino Roca and Domingo Faustino Sarmiento would be dismayed by his liberal approach. It is important to remember that education is mandatory and that the protection of childrenās rights is fundamental if we want a free, fair, equal and equitable society,ā continued Ferraro, who then invited the official to read āthe debates of the Pedagogical Congress of 1882 and Law 1420ā.
The national representative also spoke out for the Workersā Party Romina del Plawho maintained: āExploitative mentalityit is not enough to expropriate the work of adults, it also wants to expand child labor, which we remember, is prohibited. Literally a return to the 19th centuryā, and the Buenos Aires deputy Gabriel Solano, who pointed out: āThis is a libertarian: the freedom to exploit children in factories and in the countryside.ā
Likewise, the United Nations Childrenās Fund (UNICEF) also made a publication to reject the libertarianās statements, but without mentioning him. āWorking distances boys and girls from their right to learn, play and grow happily. For every childhood #RightToEducationā, they communicated.
ML / ED