Home » AMD Ryzen 5600G, 5700G built-in display performance test, CPU, APU two suitable universal decisive artifact | T客邦

AMD Ryzen 5600G, 5700G built-in display performance test, CPU, APU two suitable universal decisive artifact | T客邦

by admin

After reading the processor performance tests of Ryzen 5 5600G and Ryzen 7 5700G in the previous article, this time we will focus on the built-in display part of these two APUs to see if they can meet the needs of the game.

Focus on basic game applications

I hope that the built-in display function of the APU can compete with the independent display card. It is nothing more than a fate. Therefore, the author divides the planned test project into 5 parts. First, I still use PCMark and 3DMark to test, and then in the test part of the AAA masterpiece, Fix the resolution at 1080p and set the minimum image quality to see if it can meet the minimum standard of FPS 30 frames, or the FPS can be raised to 60 frames, and then FidelityFX Super will be tested with “Evil Castle: Village” Resolution (FSR) upscaling technology brings performance gains.

In the fourth stage, popular games with relatively low system requirements such as “Special War Hero” and “The Original God” will be used for testing, and in the fifth stage, a variety of simulators will be used for testing. Finally, the author will also supplement the h.265 conversion performance test with the Handbreak conversion software for software and hardware acceleration, as a performance reference for audio-visual creators.

The test platform used here is the same as the previous article. The main difference is that the graphics card is removed and the built-in display chip of the APU is used. For details, please refer to the previous article. Let’s start with the PCMark and 3DMark tests.

See also  Tumors, the map of the best centers for treatment is online. Here's what they are

In the 3DMark Fire Strike section, there is a big gap between the built-in display chip and the independent display card, resulting in a total score difference of about 10 times.

The situation of 3DMark Time Spy is also quite similar, reflecting the performance gap between the built-in graphics chip and the independent graphics card.

Actual game performance

In the actual game performance test, the author chose the same 6 games as the previous article, but limited the settings to 1080p resolution, the lowest picture quality, and set the eligibility standard at 30 FPS to see if it can be executed under the minimum conditions. game. Since these 2 APUs do not support ray tracing, naturally they did not enter!! The corresponding test.

Both processors use built-in display chips to carry

The average FPS of

See also  Can free revive the enthusiasm of players? Battlefield 2042 is running out of numbers | XFastest News

The average FPS of Watch Dogs: Legion of Liberty is less than 30 frames, which is judged to be lower than the minimum standard and not suitable for playing with the built-in display.

The FPS of

The test of

(There is also FSR efficacy banned drug test on the next page)

.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Privacy & Cookies Policy