Home » it’s boom. But 3 out of 10 Italians still say no – breaking latest news

it’s boom. But 3 out of 10 Italians still say no – breaking latest news

by admin
it’s boom.  But 3 out of 10 Italians still say no – breaking latest news

by Ruggiero Corcella

2023 recorded the best results ever and the largest increase in the last decade. Preliminary data from the National Transplant Center certify this

If the good morning was already seen in 2022, last year donations and transplants of organs, tissues and hematopoietic stem cells in Italy set an all-time record. We can say this with a certain satisfaction and a bit of pride – comments Massimo Cardillo, director of the National transplant center — , because they are truly important results: it is the best result ever, but also the largest increase in recent years.

We are talking about 4,462 organ transplants, 15% more than in 2022 (3,876 transplants) with a significant increase in the heart (+46.2%), lung (+33.8%), liver (+14.7%) , kidney (+10.4%, with that from a living donor decreasing by 0.3%) and pancreas (5.3%). Donations (14,912, +21%) and transplants (24,949, +16.7%) of tissues are also increasing. The data were presented today by the Minister of Health Orazio Schillaci and the director of the National Transplant Center Massimo Cardillo at the opening of the General States of the Transplant Network, which brings together over 400 operators from all over Italy in Rome until Friday.

Thus we also reached the historical record of 28.2 donors per million of the population. Still far from Spain, firmly at the top of the rankings not only in Europe but in the world with 48.9 donors per million population. Certain. But Spain has managed to build an extraordinary organizational model since the 1980s, which has become a global benchmark.

The reasons for success

What were the most important factors that contributed not only to the stabilization of a result that was already good last year, but to an improvement?

The main one is an organizational element and the numbers tell us this: the most significant data is the increase in reports from potential donors, therefore it means that hospitals are increasingly improving their ability to identify deceased subjects who may be potential donors – Cardillo replies -. This is essentially the result of the work of hospital donation coordinators and intensive care professionals, but let us remember that many healthcare professionals from other disciplines also collaborate around organ donation and must be trained, motivated and coordinated. I like to think that this is also the fruit of the work done in recent years with the National organ donation program which the CNT had already developed in 2018. The Plan contained many aimed at supporting hospital coordination and over time many regions have adapted, proceeding with the implementation of the Plan and the implementation in the field of the measures contained therein, he adds.

2020 was the year of the Covid pandemic which slowed down the process of growth of donations, because the intensive care staff had been largely dedicated to supporting the impact of the pandemic emergency. Once this delicate phase has been overcome, the process is back in motion, thanks also to the great work of the healthcare workers.

See also  Carlo Urbani: 20 years later

The different types of donation: the leap forward of DCDs

A big step forward also regarding the type of donation: how did it go? The increase occurred above all, or rather I would say exclusively, in donations from deceased subjects, because living donors did not increase significantly. As regards the former, there are two types of donation (HERE explains how the death of a person is ascertained): that which occurs after death ascertained with a neurological criterion (due to brain damage) and that ascertained with a cardiovascular criterion (for prolonged cardiac arrest) . The different methods of assessment involve different technical complexities, so in Italy the donation program from a deceased person with cardiovascular assessment (or DCD, ed.) started later than in other countries, because in our country there is a very guarantee criterion in the assessment of death, and the period of cardiac arrest needed to certify death is longer, underlines the director of the CNT.

The 20 minutes that are required by law to define death, confirmed by cardiac arrest, are a time that in the past was considered too long to maintain good organ function as heart arrest also causes damage to the organs. which then need to be transplanted. In recent years, our centers have developed techniques that allow us to overcome these critical issues, such as organ perfusion systems: with these technologies, the organs are oxygenated and “nourished” in such a way that they do not suffer damage related to the absence of blood circulation; in this way, it is possible to evaluate the function of the organs before the transplant, but in some cases also improve it.

The development of these techniques has allowed the development of the still heart donation program, which for many years had not been significant and this year we managed to transplant more than 400 organs from this type of donor, therefore almost 10 % of transplant activity was obtained thanks to organs from heart-stopped donors. With this procedure it is therefore possible to use organs that in the past were considered non-transplantable, with results that are completely comparable to those we obtain with transplantation from a deceased donor with neurological assessment.

Transplants derived from this type of donor have increased exponentially: we went from 100 in 2018 to 221 in 2022 to reach 438 transplants in 2023 thanks to organs taken from DCD. Starting last May, the DCD heart sampling program also began, an activity so far only present in Great Britain and Spain where (as in the rest of the world) the cardiac arrest time necessary to confirm death is 5 minutes compared to 20 provided for by Italian law.

See also  War medicine: who are the doctors who operate under the bombs

As many as 6 centers nationwide (starting from Padua, the first) have so far carried out 13 DCD heart sampling and transplants. The successful use of cardiac organs that collectively cope with more than 40 minutes of “warm ischemia” is currently a world record. Such a significant result is due to the increased ability of professionals in the use of organ perfusion technologies (a sector that is experiencing important development) and to the training and organizational work carried out in the area to structure healthcare teams capable of efficiently managing this type of highly complex withdrawals.

Regional data: Central-South (still) follows

Returning to organ donation, if you look at the activity divided into the 21 Regions and Provinces, Italy confirms itself for the umpteenth time at two speeds: why? true, unfortunately this is one of the sore points – admits Cardillo -. In general terms, the donation-transplant system continues to grow but this growth is not uniform and there remains great inhomogeneity between the Italian regions, although this year in some regions of Central and Southern Italy there have been significant signs of recovery. And this bodes well for the future. These inhomogeneities are not mainly linked to a problem of population sensitivity, but rather to the organizational problems we spoke about previously, linked to the implementation of the National Donations Plan.

The hard core of those who oppose donation and transplantation

Despite the exciting numbers and great steps forward, in our country there remains a hard core of people who really don’t want to know about organ donation and transplantation. As we always say, the donation and transplant system stands on two legs: one is the organization of hospitals; the second, communication with citizens. Because transplantation is a treatment that can only be provided if at its core there is a citizen’s willingness to donate. And unfortunately, compared to the increase in reports which was really important, we have not had a corresponding improvement in oppositions which are stable at around 30%. This cannot be influenced.

We have now collected almost 18 million declarations from living citizens, so today we can say that one Italian in three has already declared his will, which therefore must be respected. The development of declarations in life, hoped for by law 91/99, has changed the paradigm of communication on donation compared to the past: if once the conversation in intensive care between healthcare professionals and the potential donor’s family was the key to the collection of consent, today the expression of will given during life is of greater importance, given the 18 million declarations recorded. This means that, alongside training programs aimed at healthcare professionals and aimed at improving the relationship of help to the family members of the potential donor, it is also necessary to develop communication programs aimed at the general population, so that people make an informed and conscious choice when they are life.

The reasons for saying no to donation and transplantation

See also  The passage of Starlink satellites also in the Alessandria area

Why then do over 5 million Italians oppose a gesture, that of donation, capable of changing the fate of a person who could even die without a transplant? We have analyzed the data on this. Meanwhile, there is an important one, which tells us that opposition increases with age – says Cardillo -. Opposition percentages are higher in the older segments of the population; young people are more attentive, more generous, perhaps even more informed. We have not launched specific investigations into this specific aspect, but we can believe that in many cases the basis of the “no” is the mistaken belief of many that the elderly cannot be donors, as after a certain age the organs are not more suitable for transplantation. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Therefore, also informing on this aspect, that there are no age limits for donation, could already contribute to reducing opposition among those over 70 and 80. And then, in more general terms, among the main reasons for opposition are the mistrust towards the healthcare system as a whole, the fear that organs may be removed when a person is not yet dead, or that doctors do not treat a person appropriately and adequately if he or she has declared his or her consent to donation: these are all false myths, often also fueled by distorted communications that come from unreliable sources, as often happens with other types of hoaxes that cannot be dispelled.

Tissues and marrow, best result ever here too

The record increase in donations also had an enormous impact on tissue activity: we had 14,912 samples (+21%) and 24,949 transplants (+16.7%), with strong increases in both corneas and musculoskeletal tissue . Record year also for hematopoietic stem cells: in 2023 in Italy there were 399 bone marrow donations (+21.3%) and 1,023 transplants (+6.5%). The tendency to prefer the collection of cells from peripheral blood also continues to consolidate, a very minimally invasive method (very similar to a blood donation) which now concerns over 90% of donations.

Registrations were also very good IBMDR donor registry: 29,396 18-25 year olds were newly recruited, which brought the list of possible active donors to almost half a million (496,754).

Corriere della Sera also on Whatsapp. sufficient click here to subscribe to the channel and always be updated.

January 24, 2024 (modified January 24, 2024 | 1.37 pm)

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Privacy & Cookies Policy