Home » Vaccines, the Japanese study on side effects

Vaccines, the Japanese study on side effects

by admin

by Paolo Becchi e Nicola Trevisan

In this article, we report a study of 06 August 2021, with the aim of soliciting the reader to consider the benefit-risk of vaccinating populations under the age of 20 years, a target much desired and longed for by our CTS, the Ministry of Health and super-star virologists.

The study analyzed 3,998 individuals for whom adverse events (within 30 minutes of inoculation of the first dose of Moderna) occurred on 20 individuals equal to 0.05%; including 1 severe anaphylaxis in a woman.

The survey questionnaire issued for the collection of observations was completed by 1,993 subjects (49.8% of the total); 1,887 of these agreed to participate in the study. With a distribution of 66% women and 34% men; 24% were under the age of 20.

Table 3 summarizes the ade detected: general and systematic adverse events were generally “mild”; 82% experienced local pain; 71% pain at the injection site, while the ade systemic occurred in 48%. L’ade most common was myalgia 34% and fatigue 31%.

However, almost all of them symptoms improved without any treatment. The percentage of participants with local itching and redness after day 7 were 27% and 19%, respectively. The onset of myalgia occurred on the same day and the day after the injection (98%) and symptoms persisted for 2-3 days, somewhat longer than other systemic adverse reactions (73%). Of those who developed symptoms, 75% did not undergo any treatment and 17% were given paracetamol. General fatigue often occurred on the day of injection (94%) and continued for the next 2-3 days (66%).

See also  Does breastfeeding for at least a year make babies smarter? |

An important evaluation of the study was directed to the female population, dividing it by those who presented a history of allergic events (AE), with those who have never experienced such problems (NO-AE). Table 4 summarizes the analyzed sample: it is noted that there is a greater historical AE for local adverse events compared to NO-AE; while for systemic adverse events, the situation was almost similar.

The results of the multivariate analysis of the AE and No-AE groups are shown in Table 5. We leave it to the reader to analyze the details on pages 10-11 of the pdf file that can be downloaded free of charge. link.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Privacy & Cookies Policy