The court of Treviso where the trial is underway
Among the defendants there was also a lawyer accused of being the reference professional of foreigners who were willing to pay thousands of euros in order to stay in Italy
TREVISO. The trial of 11 defendants accused of aiding illegal immigration postponed to February 2022. Among the prominent names, there is also that of the lawyer Stefania Filippi who comes to the charge indicated as a “reference professional” a mechanism aimed at “procuring entry into Italy and favoring the permanence of numerous foreigners, in violation of the immigration law”. In turn, the foreigners, about thirty, funded the mechanism that allowed them to obtain the coveted residence permits by paying up to 10,000 euros.
The investigation was triggered by an investigation by the Treviso mobile team in 2009. 12 years after the start of the investigation, the proceedings arrived only yesterday at the first hearing before the judges of the Treviso college chaired by Francesco Sartorio (on the sidelines Leonardo Bianco and Cristian Vettoruzzo) but a lack of notification caused the hearing to be skipped, which was updated to February of the year next one. Needless to say, theprescription is incumbent on the process.
In addition to the Treviso lawyer, the defendant also includes the Sandonatese Franco Biscaro, 57 years old, Hamadi Abdourabbih, 53 years of Preganziol, Domenico “Mimmo” D’Agostini, 78 years old from Montebelluna, Sandro Costantini, 56 years of Fossalta di Piave, Antonio Basile, 61 years old from Casal di Principe, Driss Rebroub, 44 years of Cornuda, Ala Parfeni, 47 years old from Istrana, Ekrem Gasi 42 years of Spresiano, Frederik Frimpong, 49 years of Preganziol, e Issah Ibrahim, 49 years old from Treviso.
She was also involved in the affair Patrizia Loiola, 58 years old from Sandonà, president of the Forcop Cora Venezia, the cooperative, accredited by the Veneto region, which organized the 6-month training courses for learning the Italian language, essential for obtaining a residence permit. The point is that Loiola, like his lawyer, the lawyer Barbara de Biasi, demonstrated in an abbreviated trial, was completely unaware of the alleged round of false papers to get the residence permit to the immigrants who paid, and was acquitted. “She – writes judge Marco Biagetti in the reasons for the acquittal – deceived by Biscaro believed that all the internships were actually practiced, when instead they were not held or were prepared in a way that did not comply with the signed agreements”. –