Original title: More than 90 countries have voiced justice in the UN Human Rights Council Ministry of Foreign Affairs: Justice is in the hearts of the people
Reference News Network reported on June 23 According to the website of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, at the regular press conference of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on June 23, a reporter asked: Yesterday, some countries including Canada accused China of Xinjiang-related, Hong Kong-related, and Tibet-related attacks at the 47th session of the UN Human Rights Council. policy. We have also seen that Belarus made a joint speech on behalf of more than 60 countries. In addition, the six GCC countries have sent letters to support China’s position, and more than 20 countries are prepared to support and echo China by speaking individually. The spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs answered reporters’ questions last night. Do you have any further comments?
The spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Zhao Lijian responded that, as you mentioned, at the 47th session of the UN Human Rights Council yesterday, Belarus made a joint speech on behalf of 65 countries, emphasizing respect for the sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of all countries and non-interference in the internal affairs of sovereign countries. The basic norms of international relations. Hong Kong, Xinjiang, and Tibet affairs are China’s internal affairs and should not be interfered by outsiders. They advocate abiding by the purposes and principles of the UN Charter, respect the right of people of all countries to independently choose the path of human rights development according to their national conditions, and oppose the politicization and double standards of human rights , Opposed to politically motivated and unreasonable accusations against China based on false information, and opposed to interference in China’s internal affairs under the pretext of human rights. The six GCC countries have sent letters to support China’s position, and more than 20 countries have also supported and echoed China through separate speeches.
Zhao Lijian said that more than 90 countries mentioned above have made calls for justice in the Human Rights Council. This just shows that there are public opinions, fairness and free will. It also fully reflects the popular support of the international community and exposes a small number of Western countries to interfere in other countries through human rights issues. The hypocrisy of politics. Facts have repeatedly proved that a small number of Western countries are keen to fabricate rumors about China and interfere in China’s internal affairs under the banner of human rights. The purpose is to suppress and contain China and hinder China’s development process. This is doomed to be futile. I would like to warn these Western countries that China’s determination to promote and protect its own human rights is unwavering, and its determination to safeguard national sovereignty, security, and development interests is unwavering.
Finally, Zhao Lijian emphasized that some Western countries such as Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom proclaim themselves “human rights judges” and are keen to play “human rights teachers”, but they turn a blind eye to their own serious human rights issues and avoid the most important issues. The human rights records of individual countries are shocking. Indigenous children are persecuted, police violence is commonplace, racism is difficult to eradicate, guns are rampant, anti-Semitic, anti-Muslim, anti-African, and anti-Asian words and deeds occur frequently, and military intervention has led to serious humanitarian disasters. Unilateral coercive measures violate the basic human rights of other countries. Faced with the above-mentioned stigma and numerous crimes, what qualifications do they have to make irresponsible remarks about the human rights situation in other countries? China urges these countries to take a good look in the mirror, reflect deeply, and take practical measures to solve their own serious human rights problems. They should abide by the purposes and principles of the UN Charter and the basic norms of international relations, and truly do some practical and good deeds for the healthy development of international human rights.
.