[Epoch Times November 4, 2021]Recently, a class of Yuanping No. 1 Primary School in Xinzhou, Shanxi conducted a survey on the family situation of students. The students were divided into 11 categories according to their parents’ backgrounds, including “children of power monopoly departments” and “leaders”. “Children” and so on, aroused an uproar in the public opinion.
A statistical table of students in the third grade and second class of Yuanping No. 1 Primary School in Shanxi has been circulating on the Internet. The table divides students into 11 categories: female students, divorced single-parent students, dropout students, leaders’ children, business owners’ children, and powers. Children of the monopoly department, students whose parents have criminal records, students with poor academic performance and poor grades, students from other places or from various relationships, students who fall in love, and students whose parents have religious beliefs.
The “children of the power monopoly sector”, “children of leaders”, and children of business bosses in this category have obvious hierarchical divisions and discriminatory questionnaires, which aroused the resentment of the outside world.
Wang Renping, a big V on Sina Weibo in mainland China, said in a post, “Looking at these 11 categories, whether you can classify high and low according to parental power, or label students according to performance, is not only an infringement on the privacy of students’ family information, but also a humiliation to the dignity of students. , They are all very obvious cross-border and ultra-powerful behaviors. Even if the teacher does not treat students differently, this kind of information collection itself is instilling the concepts of power, relationship, and hierarchy in the students. It is a very bad and very dirty’education’ .”
Yang Hongxu, deputy dean of the E-House Research Institute, said, “Let’s see, where is the teacher’s ethics? A malignant tumor in China’s education sector!”
On November 2, the staff of Yuanping No. 1 Elementary School responded to Lu Media that the investigation of this matter had been stopped, and some head teachers did not understand this meaning, and his approach was inappropriate. (The school) did this work according to the above arrangement, but he “has not had a deep understanding of the spirit of the meeting, lack of understanding, and improper practice.”
On the same day, Yuanping City Educational Technology Bureau issued a notice stating that Yuanping No. 1 Elementary School had been notified and criticized in the city’s education system, the principal of Yuanping No. 1 Elementary School was admonished, the deputy principal in charge of Yuanping No. 2) The teacher in charge of the class appraised the qualifications of the excellent appraisal model in that year, and was not allowed to be promoted to the title in that year.
Regarding this, mainland netizens said, “It’s obviously a unified registration form for the whole school, not made by a certain class teacher.” “If the school doesn’t signal, the class teacher will find work on his own.” Each school sent it down and asked the head teacher to do the statistics.” “The head teacher is also very miserable.
Editor in charge: Xu Menger#
.