1. Lilly wasn’t poisoned
No poison, no drugs. This is the conclusion of the toxicological counseling request by the Trieste prosecutor Antonio de Nicolo, who in recent days clarified: “In conclusion, the toxicological determinations on the various biological matrices delivered to the laboratory do not demonstrate the intake of xenobiotic substances, drugs and medications, which may have caused the death of the subject or concentrations that can
having contributed to an unconscious altered psychophysical state “, explains the latest statement. The exams have instead found traces of tachipirina and aspirin. The last thing Lilly could have done before she died.
2. She was not beaten
In January the autopsy had clarified that the 63-year-old retired from the Region – disappeared from home on December 14 and found again corpse on January 5th in a park – she hadn’t been beaten, “were not detected trauma from the hand of others acts to justify the death. “In fact, the coroner had attributed the death to “acute heart failure”.
Liliana Resinovich, the 3 unanswered questions
3. She was alive between 8 and 9 on December 14th
Between 8 and 9 of December 14, the day of the disappearance, Liliana Resinovich passed in front of the shop of Iva, the fruit seller in via San Cilino, a street in the San Giovanni district where Lilly lived with her husband Sebastiano Visintin. She had one gloomy look, worried, the trader will then say. Soon after, Liliana Resinovich was filmed by a video camera in Piazzale Gioberti, the nearby bus terminus. Then, the emptiness.
4. How could she be dead
At this point, we enter the world of hypotheses. The investigation still keeps the two hypotheses open, homocide e suicide. Fulvio Covalero, Liliana’s friend since his youth, he thought of a reconstruction, then somehow ‘endorsed’ also by the criminologist Bruzzone. “I think Lilly may have been subjected to a violent verbal assault and she died from that.” In short, she would have given her heart. Let’s start again from the bus terminus. Covalero continues: “She could have gotten into the car with someone she knew well, someone she trusted.” The same one that she would have hidden the body, only to have it found in the grove of the former psychiatric hospital.
5. The finding of the body
The state of conservation of the corpse, Covalero reasons, could be explained as follows. He reflects: “In this case we should then be talking about someone who caused his death, not who killed her. A violent discussion with unpredictable outcomes.”