Veronika and Sebastian Bohrn Mena have filed a civil lawsuit towards Lena Schilling.
Lena Schilling is claimed to have claimed in personal that home violence had occurred among the many Bohrn Menas. When the couple discovered in regards to the alleged rumors, Schilling needed to signal a cease-and-desist settlement to not unfold the declare any additional.
Bohrn Mena on oe24.TV: “We tried to make clear this privately”
“We tried twice to make clear this privately,” stated Sebastian Bohrn Mena on Tuesday night on oe24.TV. Only then did the couple say that they wished the stop and desist declaration. “Then we discovered that new individuals are at all times discovering out in regards to the rumors.” Lena Schilling instructed increasingly individuals in regards to the rumors.
The Standard’s journalists “knew the contents of the cease-and-desist declaration and approached my spouse with it,” stated Bohrn Mena: “They did not get it from us.”
“Lena Schilling will not be our opponent”
“We do not need to smash this younger girl’s future, however we’ve to demand that the false narrative of the caring pal would not proceed to be unfold,” says Bohrn Mena: “Lena Schilling will not be our opponent”
“We desire a public retraction. We need her to publicly admit that she made these allegations not simply to 1 particular person out of concern, however to a number of individuals,” he stated. Bohrn Mena makes it clear: “This doesn’t need to occur in court docket.” But he’s now suing in order that there can lastly be readability.
Video on the subject: FELLNER! LIVE: Sebastian Bohrn Mena in an interview
On Monday, Sebastian Bohrn Mena introduced to oe24 that he would sue “Lena Schilling this week” if she didn’t apologize. “We desire a public revocation,” stated Sebastian and Veronika Bohrn Mena. Schilling needed to make it clear “that it wasn’t ‘out of concern for a pal’.”
Bohrn Mena agreed that that they had “waited for a very long time”, however nothing had occurred oe24. That’s why there’s now a civil lawsuit towards the Greens’ EU prime candidate. The first assembly is scheduled to happen on June twenty first – after the EU elections. The assertion of declare has already been despatched to Schilling’s lawyer, Maria Windhager. However, the couple is open to a settlement, for instance by Schilling publicly apologizing, Bohrn instructed Mena oe24. Schilling is presumed harmless.
What occurred?
After the cease-and-desist declaration turned public, Schilling defined that she had made the allegations of violence “out of concern” for her former pal Veronika Bohrn Mena. According to Sebastian Bohrn Mena, that is “fictitious”.
Bohrn Mena: “Completely false narrative”
“In any case, we will now not settle for the demonstrably fully false narrative of the ‘pal who solely spoke to 1 particular person about her worries’ unchallenged,” stated Bohrn Mena yesterday by way of X (previously Twitter). “It’s merely not true” and it will also be confirmed by “chats and witnesses,” Bohrn defined to Mena oe24.
“Because sure, it makes an important distinction whether or not you’re genuinely involved about somebody or whether or not you actively forestall assist (!) and as a substitute unfold untruths to a number of individuals,” stated Bohrn Mena in his assertion. This was by no means about “a caring pal,” however about “different issues.” However, Bohrn Mena didn’t need to categorical this publicly – “to guard Lena”.
No curiosity in “destructing” Schilling
“The unfounded rumors that Lena Schilling demonstrably unfold to a number of individuals, which then circulated in even bigger circles, have to be ended by an unequivocal retraction from her,” demanded Bohrn Mena. The couple would insist on this – “even in court docket if needed”.
However, Bohrn Mena was under no circumstances “ within the destruction of this particular person” who was “held very near their hearts”. They simply need “it to lastly be made clear what actually occurred right here.”
Federal President feedback on the Schilling case
Almost concurrently the civil lawsuit towards Schilling turned recognized, Federal President Alexander Van der Bellen additionally commented on the matter. Who as a teen would not make errors, requested Van der Bellen within the Ö1 interview – ought to Schilling have even made one? He definitely did some as a younger man.
Van der Bellen may chorus from dragging his personal life into election campaigns: “Politics is one factor and personal life is one other.”
The head of state additionally emphasised that he didn’t but know Schilling. But he has organized appointments with the highest candidates for this week. Basically, Van der Bellen said that he was joyful about each younger one that was keen to sacrifice their time for necessary issues resembling measures towards local weather change or the EU elections.
The former Green Party chief defined that he had typically puzzled whether or not the tone in politics had turn into extra unforgiving lately. But the tone was additionally shrill between the SPÖ and ÖVP within the Fifties and Nineteen Sixties. Therefore, one mustn’t exaggerate on this regard: “But the tone is simply too shrill,” stated the President.
Green Party State Secretary: “It’s simply the best way it’s”
State Secretary for Culture Andrea Mayer (Greens) stated in regards to the debate within the noon “ZiB” that it was definitely a troublesome part for the Green authorities crew: “But that is simply the best way it’s.” Mistakes occurred to everybody. Traffic spokesman Hermann Weratschnig is outwardly not fully pleased with the disaster communication: Everything in all probability did not go as deliberate on this regard.