Home » Read it for you and found it to be good!

Read it for you and found it to be good!

by admin
Read it for you and found it to be good!

Literature review of criminal tax law

Ebner

Note BGH 1 StR 14/23 – Relationship between incorrect VAT advance returns and omitted – and therefore not effective as a “correction” – VAT annual return

HFR 23, 918

Ebner

Note BGH 1 StR 340/22 ‒ Statute of limitations for tax evasion

HFR 23, 1028

Ebner

Note LG Nürnberg-Fürth 12 KLs 506 Js 609/22 ‒ No entitlement to the release of arrested funds to finance a voluntary disclosure

jurisPR-TaxR 42/2023 Note 3

Emmerich

Note FG Hamburg 2 K 172/19 ‒ Scope of the tax administration’s right to access data

EFG 23, 1429

Greiner

Note OLG Bremen 1 Ws 6/23 ‒ Public defender in the event of a threat of confiscation of a significant amount

jurisPR-StrafR 18/2023 Note 1

Gude

Let’s get dangerous ‒ On the scope of the special obligation to cooperate in accordance with Section 153 Paragraph 4 AO and the associated criminal tax law implications

DStR 23, 2261

Höpfner/Stahnke

Ransomware extortion from the perspective of tax (criminal) law (Parts I and II)

DStR 23, 2136 ff.; 2200 ff.

Huttner

Note FG Nuremberg 4 K 1287/20 ‒ Advertising expenses due to liability claims by the shareholder-managing director of a GmbH for their tax debts; Inflow/outflow principle when confiscating cash in a bank safe deposit box

EFG 23, 1447

Hunter

Current developments in criminal tax law

NStZ 23, 591

Krautheim

VAT fraud in the context of “Procedure 42” and the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (Part II, III, IV)

AW-Prax 23, 342 ff; 462 ff; 513 ff.

Meyer

LuxLeaks, Cum-Ex & Co. ‒ New ECHR guidelines for whistleblowing in transnational contexts, need for legislative action

See also  You need 3 different bank accounts, says expert

JZ 23, 261

Nieskens

The problem of performance attribution is shown using the example of the “correct” taxation of prostitution services – at the same time a comment on the divergence between the Federal Court of Justice, decision v. May 5, 2022 and the established BFH case law

UR 23, 741

Rolletschke

Determination of intent in criminal tax law – laying a mosaic

NZWiSt 23, 368

Spatschek/

Wimmer

Edge protection ‒ simplification of investigations at the expense of proportionality

AO-StB 23, 307

Teixeira

The nemo tenetur principle and non-criminal cooperation obligations

ZStW 23, 253

Vobbe/Pötters

The limitations of the neutrality principle in the light of current abuse case law

UR 23, 777

Weil

The (independent) confiscation in the context of Sections 153 ff. StPO

NZWiSt 23, 366

Wulf

Saved expenses as “something gained”? ‒ On the scope of asset confiscation in criminal tax and duty law

wistra 23, 397

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Privacy & Cookies Policy