Home » “Wrong to imply that having it is safe”

“Wrong to imply that having it is safe”

by admin

“It is right to use the ‘pass’ as an incentive to vaccinate, it is wrong to imply that having it, even after a single dose of vaccine, you are safe, as I know, in an indoor restaurant with one hundred other people, just for do an example”. This was stated in ‘Il Fatto Quotidiano’ by Andrea Crisanti, professor of microbiology at the University of Padua. “That herd immunity was impossible was already clear to me for some time, now we have the certainty. The only positive purpose of the green pass, as I see it, is to increase the percentage of vaccinated. But be careful: not it is a public health measure as passed by the government in a totally wrong way. “

“The green pass – he underlines – is boasted as a measure to create safe environments, it makes no sense at all, nothing more false. I am not against the use of the green pass in a broad sense, just call it for what it is. I do not tolerate it. ‘hypocrisy of the government on this. If a state wants to enforce the law it must impose very clear sanctions but it cannot lie “.

See also  Stay match longer: stay to 100? 4 tricks to enhance your life

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Privacy & Cookies Policy