The discussion about the “defamation” of unvaccinated people in the Corona phase continues – and also about the study commission. Now the “Berliner Zeitung” is completely open about it spokenthat there were some politicians who defamed unvaccinated people – and who are “now keeping quiet about their statements”. We document the case – and refer you to another evaluation.
Habeck and Co.: Now there is silence
The politicians wanted to “make life difficult” for the unvaccinated during the pandemic, as they say or said. The newspaper goes even further: the politicians wanted to get people to get vaccinated “despite possible side effects that were not yet sufficiently researched at the time.” In addition, it was not known “whether the vaccination can prevent the infection of others at all – as is now known, it cannot.”
Now voices are being raised that also want clarification. For example through Robert Habeck. He wants a phase of reflection “about the difficult pandemic period with all its effects”. This could definitely get to him. Because on July 29, 2021, Habeck let it be known that the “pandemic would be carried out on the backs of children” because “adults are too lame to get vaccinated”. Therefore the motto is “So people: syringe in the arm”.
His recommendation at the time: The STIKO should “get going a bit” when it came to allowing the vaccination of children over 12 years old. His advice: “We don’t have enough data, we can’t comment on it” is not a “good enough stance” because the situation is what it is.
In addition, today’s Economic and Climate Protection Minister announced that “those who have been vaccinated (…) have (will) more rights”. Six months later, we now know that Habeck would make further comments: he called for general vaccination requirements. “So vote for a motion that maintains herd immunity in Germany so that we can defeat the virus.” It is said that he has not yet responded to an inquiry from the Berliner Zeitung.
One of the politicians who also commented is the FDP top politician Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann. In the event that someone “refuses to be vaccinated”, they demanded that “as a minority they should not be allowed to terrorize the majority”. They would therefore also be confronted with “corresponding rules.” She did not respond to a request for comment.
We document the entire case in great detail. Here.
– Advertisement –
You can find everything about Corona measures and this evaluation here – just click!
– Advertisement –