Home » The judges rejected the Gesco «EcoAmbiente a Sardone» – breaking latest news

The judges rejected the Gesco «EcoAmbiente a Sardone» – breaking latest news

by admin

Maria Imparato and Massimo Consoli, and the Municipality of Giffoni, which did not appear in court. Appeals rejected. And the reasons are many: first of all, “Gesco” has been betrayed by time, because the authorization issued to the subsidiary of the “Sa2” municipalities expired on 31 December last, and therefore “the company does not currently boast any title to carry out the activity “. Mother of all because, in any case, it is the reorganization of the waste cycle, redesigned by the now well-known regional law 14 of 2016, “which – the judges recall – assigns the management of waste matters only to the regions and municipalities. identifies only in the EDA the person in charge of carrying out the related duties “. An approach that has gone beyond the previous phase, the second, that of the Provincial Authority with its hands in the garbage, and even more so the first, that of the “system, still previous, which entrusted the management functions to the basin consortia and related instrumental companies “.

In Sardone, until last December, the waste cycle was still at that stage, the first. That of the “Corisa”. Surprised, the magistrates of Largo San Tommaso agitate an old report signed by the liquidator of “Gesco Ambiente”, Vincenzo Morriello: it was a management report of December 2019. “It is surprising – the judges thundered – that the liquidator himself is fully aware of the transience of management by “Gesco” ». They cite an excerpt from that report: “At present, we read – talks and negotiations are underway with Eda Salerno for the transfer of the company business.”

See also  Inspection by the Government Commissioner in the Lamezia Roma camp - News

In short, the judges say, “the overcoming of the system based on the mandatory consortia of the basin has determined the exhaustion of the statutory purpose of the consortia themselves and of the consortium companies”. In other words, once the era of consortia disappeared, “Gesco” would no longer have a raison d’etre. Nor to oppose the direct assignment from Eda to EcoAmbiente, because the negotiation procedures can only be challenged by those who could possibly win them. This is not the case with the “Gesco”, which belongs to the past. Word of the judges.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Privacy & Cookies Policy