Attorney Adami sure: “The match against Atalanta is still to be played”

THE INTERVIEW

“Udinese-Atalanta is a game still to be played”. This was supported by the Udine lawyer Giovanni Adami, an expert in sports law and president of the regional FIP who commented on the provision of the Friuli Venezia Giulia Tar with which Udinese rekindled the hopes of repeating the challenge lost 6-2 with the Goddess, last January 9, result already approved in two levels of judgment.

Adami, how do you comment on the provision of the Tar, which was welcomed by the company on Monday?

“The TAR felt that, having played the game regularly, it made no sense to stay alive the suspension arranged by the decree of January 8, 2022, since the match was played and the original appeal of the League was aimed exclusively at that event and not to other subsequent matches ».

Now what must Udinese do if they want to replay the match?

“In compliance with the timing and the procedure, it is clear that if Udinese wants to repeat the match against Atalanta they must immediately focus on the provision of the sports judge with which the appeal against the result of the match approved also in the second instance by the Court was rejected. sport of appeal, internal organ of the FIGC ».

Are there any conditions for the game to be replayed?

“For now, the ruling of the sports judge of 25 January and the confirmation of the sports court of appeal have been clear-cut and contrary to this hypothesis, but Udinese is within the deadline to contact the Coni guarantee board, thus leaving the supply chain internal judicial bodies of the FIGC, thus breathing an air of more marked impartiality “.

As regards the Administrative Court, however, does the last order put an end to the purpose of repeating the meeting?

“No, certainly even in the administrative stage it did not end here because the TAR has set the last hearing for May 11, and that could be definitive, but just to make the procedure even more complicated, in the parallel appeal before the Campania TAR , relating to Salernitana-Venice, the local court had to suspend the procedure by returning the documents to the United Sections of Cassation to understand whether the initial decision of the League to apply to the regional administrative courts has been corrected, or rather whether it should have affected others judges “.

Is it a crawl space from which you risk not getting out?

“It comes out only waiting for the individual decisions and hoping that they are not in conflict with each other …”.

Adami, could the favorable ruling of the Tar Fvg also affect the sporting appeals that Udinese is cultivating with Fiorentina in the future?

“For now, at this stage, the Julian court has not given importance to the hypotheses of any connection between the administrative appeal and those pending before the sports justice”. –

© breaking latest news