Nintendo fans are divided over the debate on whether 30 frames per second (FPS) is enough for gaming on the popular Switch console. While some argue that the smooth gameplay and fun experiences provided by Nintendo’s games make up for the lower FPS, others believe that higher FPS is essential for a better gaming experience.
The controversy started when a loyal Nintendo fan, known as “NintenGOD”, took to Twitter to express their support for 30FPS, claiming that “95% of people cannot tell the difference between 30 and 60FPS.” They argued that the highly acclaimed game “Astral Chain” on the Switch is proof that 30FPS is sufficient for a great gaming experience.
However, this opinion was met with pushback from netizens who disagreed with NintenGOD’s stance. Many pointed out that the difference between 30FPS and 60FPS is noticeable to most people and can have a significant impact on game performance, especially in genres like first-person shooters.
The debate even made its way to online forums, with users on the Hong Kong Liandeng discussion forum comparing the argument to the outdated belief that “56K is enough” for internet browsing. Critics argue that while a game may be enjoyable at 30FPS, the industry is moving towards higher frame rates and players should not have to compromise on performance.
Overall, the discussion highlights the ongoing divide in the gaming community regarding the importance of FPS and how it affects the overall gaming experience. As technology continues to advance, it remains to be seen whether Nintendo will address the issue of lower FPS on its consoles to meet the demands of modern gamers.