/cloudfront-eu-central-1.images.arcpublishing.com/prisa/URKQVY55S5AVRLFW2TFZG3FXE4.jpg "Petro opens the door to a Constituent Assembly due to the stagnation of his reforms")
President Gustavo Petro has sparked controversy by mentioning the possibility of calling for a National Constituent Assembly in Colombia. Despite previous assurances that he would not seek to extend his rule beyond his current term, Petro’s recent comments have reignited fears of potential power consolidation.
The president made the remarks during a speech in Cali, citing the stagnation of his reforms in Congress as a reason for considering a Constituent Assembly. He suggested that if the existing institutions were not able to implement the desired changes for peace and justice in Colombia, a new Assembly may be necessary.
Political leaders from across the spectrum have reacted strongly to Petro’s proposal, with some labeling it as dictatorial and unnecessary. Critics have pointed out Petro’s past promises to refrain from calling for a Constituent Assembly, raising doubts about his intentions.
The road to convening a Constituent Assembly in Colombia is complex, involving approval from Congress and significant public support. The potential implications of such a move are uncertain, as it could lead to significant changes in the country’s governance structure.
Petro is not the first leader to suggest a Constituent Assembly in Colombia, with former President Álvaro Uribe also proposing it in the past for different reasons. The debate surrounding the necessity and implications of such a move continues to divide opinion in the country.
The prospect of a National Constituent Assembly in Colombia remains a contentious issue, with the potential for far-reaching consequences on the country’s political landscape. As Petro’s comments stir debate and controversy, the future of governance in Colombia hangs in the balance.