Author: Guo Yan
“Holding conclusions to find arguments” is a typical operation of some American politicians. However, in the face of facts and science, the wishful thinking of “sweeping the pot” of other countries is destined to fail. After all, the source of the virus must respect science rather than obedience to politics.
The United States‘ attempts to let intelligence agencies lead the conclusions and manipulate the discourse power of traceability issues are obvious. People will never forget that the United States relied on the so-called “evidence” of intelligence agencies, but in fact a bag of washing powder, to brazenly wage war against Iraq, causing countless innocent civilian casualties. On the issue of virus traceability this time, a series of operations such as intelligence processing, media campaigns, and individual so-called expert platforms have made us smell familiar.
In the final analysis, some American politicians don’t care about facts and truth at all, nor are they interested in serious scientific tracing, but want to use the epidemic to engage in political manipulation and push blame. Former U.S. Secretary of State Pompeo once said, “We (CIA) lie, we deceive, we steal. We also have a course to teach these. This is the glory of America’s continuous exploration and progress.” This is what the United States said. , And do the same. This is true for the traceability of the new coronavirus. “Holding conclusions to find arguments” is a typical operation of some American politicians. However, in the face of facts and science, the wishful thinking of “sweeping the pot” of other countries is destined to fail. After all, the source of the virus must respect science rather than obedience to politics. As the chief expert on emergency affairs of the World Health Organization Ryan pointed out recently, the entire (tracing) process has been poisoned by political factors, “We demand that science and politics be separated, so that we can continue to find what we need in an appropriate and positive atmosphere. answer”.
As we all know, as early as March 30, the World Health Organization published a new coronavirus traceability report, which clearly stated that “it is extremely unlikely that the virus will leak from the laboratory.” This is the most authoritative, formal, and scientific conclusion on the issue of virus traceability. The United States to allow intelligence personnel to trace the source of the virus is not only a desecration of the scientific spirit and research results of the members of the WHO expert group, but also politicizing scientific issues and undermining the global anti-epidemic force.
In fact, stigmatizing China by tracing the source of the epidemic is an “old routine” used by the US government to blame itself. Since the outbreak of the new crown pneumonia epidemic, the Trump administration has emptied its brains to hype the so-called “laboratory origin theory,” falsely claiming that the virus originated in China, but all failed. This “unfinished business” of Trump has now risen to the ground, thoroughly exposing the United States‘ paradox and hypocrisy.
Virus tracing is a serious and complicated scientific issue. Any deviation from the scientific spirit is irresponsible to history and to all mankind. News of the early detection of new crown cases has appeared from time to time. Reuters reported on June 1 that two Italian scientists said that the WHO had appointed a university in the Netherlands to retest samples of the new coronavirus that were collected deliberately. The sample shows that the new coronavirus has spread in Italy in October 2019. A WHO spokesperson said that the test results have not yet been finalized. The follow-up research report will be announced soon.
Faced with the issue of virus traceability, China has always maintained an open, transparent and responsible attitude. At the beginning of this year, China invited a WHO expert team to Wuhan to conduct a traceability investigation, which has set an example for the world. If the United States is open, it should invite WHO experts to investigate in the United States, just like China. After all, people all over the world want to know the answer to the chaotic timeline of the epidemic and sensitive biological laboratory issues in the United States. Last year, the United States withdrew from the WHO’s obstruction investigation, and this time it returns, shouldn’t it have a basic sense of responsibility? (Guo Yan)
[
责编：郑芳芳 ]
.