Stocks are based on the research report of Golden Unicorn analysts, authoritative, professional, timely and comprehensive, to help you tap potential thematic opportunities!
The number of attendees at the general meeting of shareholders is incorrect, and the vote count is repeated Shilong IndustryCorrection of the resolutions of the extraordinary general meeting
Original Securities Daily Network The Voice of Securities Daily
Recently, due to frequent chaos in the general meeting of shareholders, Shilong Industrial has received extensive attention from the capital market.
On August 28, Shilong Industrial announced that the company disclosed the “Announcement on Resolutions of the First Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders in 2021” on August 26. After verification, some shareholders of the company participated in the online voting on the day of the meeting. On-site voting has led to the company’s repeated counting of votes.
At present, the senior management of Shilong Industrial is divided into two camps. One of them, led by Wang Guoqing and Liu Yiyun, questioned the other party, led by Liu Linsheng and Zeng Daolong, who falsely reported the number of participants and did not announce the number of shares with voting rights, and at the same time questioned the other party. Accept the votes of shareholders whose voting rights are restricted by the People’s Court; while the party headed by Liu Linsheng and Zeng Daolong forcefully announces the results of unilateral statistics and publicly announces the resolutions of the general meeting of shareholders… “Fighting Shilong Industry’s five-and-a-half-hour shareholder meeting: “Chaos” is the four major conflicts leading to physical conflict between the contradictory parties”)
According to the announcement, Shilong Industrial corrected the attendance of the meeting, and “the total number of shareholders, shareholder representatives, and entrusted agents who participated in the voting of this general meeting of shareholders is 322, representing 77,149,244 shares of the company, accounting for the total number of shares of the company. 32.1455%.”, corrected to “the total number of shareholders, shareholder representatives and entrusted agents who participated in the voting of this general meeting of shareholders is 286, representing 77,071,044 shares of the company, accounting for 32.1129% of the total number of shares of the company.”
And “there are 79 shareholders, shareholder representatives and entrusted agents who attended the on-site meeting, representing 37,543,433 shares of the company, accounting for 15.6431% of the company’s total shares;”, the correction was changed to “shareholders and shareholder representatives attending the on-site meeting A total of 79 people and authorized agents, excluding 36 people who have voted online, 43 shareholders, shareholder representatives and authorized agents actually attended the on-site meeting, representing 37,465,233 shares of the company, accounting for 15.6105 of the total number of shares of the company %.”
Shilong Industrial’s shareholders’ meeting reviewed 5 issues. In the announcement on August 28, the company also made a lot of corrections to the voting status of these 5 issues. However, the results of the deliberations of this general meeting of shareholders are still that the deliberation of Zeng Daolong and Liu Linsheng has not been approved, the removal of Liu Yiyun has been approved, the election of Shu Yunfan as a non-independent director of the fourth board of directors, and Ouyang Zu You are the independent director of the 4th Board of Directors. The reporter noticed that in the legal opinion of the first extraordinary general meeting of shareholders of 2021 announced by Shilong Industrial on August 28, it also made corresponding corrections to the attendance and voting of the meeting.
What is the reason for such a major mistake in the Shilong Industrial Shareholders’ Meeting? Has the on-site witness lawyer checked the ticket? A few days ago, a reporter from the Securities Daily called Jiangxi Jingtian Law Firm, but no one answered it.
“At the meeting of shareholders, the witnessing lawyer did not publicly announce the results of the voting. This is a process that must be done and cannot be made up later.” A shareholder of Shilong Industry told reporters, “At the meeting of shareholders. , The witness lawyer did not publicly announce the number of votes, indicating that there is a very big problem in the assembly procedure. The witness lawyer arbitrarily corrected the result of the vote, indicating that the original vote count was indeed problematic. The result of the hastily corrected vote count did not go through the vote scrutiny. People scrutinize votes, and it is not ruled out that many issues will be corrected later.”
Duan Wei, a professor and doctoral supervisor of the Minzu University of China, said, “Whether it is participation, voting, counting or scrutiny of votes, it is a procedural issue. The substantive issue is whether the content of the resolution itself violates the law. According to the company According to the relevant provisions of the law, procedural flaws are the same as illegal acts, which will have an important impact on the resolutions of the shareholders’ meeting itself, so the meeting votes made can be revoked.”
Regarding the problems arising from the first extraordinary shareholders meeting of Shilong Industrial in 2021, reporters from the Securities Daily have reported many times before, and the most controversial issue is “Whether Longqiang Investment can vote on the current shareholders meeting of Shilong Industrial” With voting rights, can Shilong Industry accept Longqiang Investment’s entrusted agent to vote at this shareholder meeting? “This matter,” may be determined by the local court in the near future. At that time, if all the votes of Longqiang Investment are removed, this time The resolution of the general meeting of shareholders may undergo a major reversal.” A person familiar with the matter said.
Massive information, accurate interpretation, all in Sina Finance APP
Editor in charge: Yang Hongbu
.