Home Entertainment Li Jinglei exposed the content of the divorce agreement in response to Wang Leehom’s lawyer’s statement that she felt threatened_Mr. Wang_Suggestion_Both Agree

Li Jinglei exposed the content of the divorce agreement in response to Wang Leehom’s lawyer’s statement that she felt threatened_Mr. Wang_Suggestion_Both Agree

by admin

Original title: Li Jinglei exposed the content of the divorce agreement in response to Wang Leehom’s lawyer’s statement that she felt threatened

Sohu Entertainment News on January 13, Wang Leehom’s brokerage company conveyed the lawyer’s meeting proposal statement earlier, saying that the lawyer suggested that he should not get along with Li Jinglei alone without the company of an adult recognized by the lawyer, “She has turned their divorce into one. A smear campaign full of fiction and malicious intent.”

In response, Li Jinglei responded to the “Lawyer Wang Leehom’s Statement” at noon today (January 13), revealing that the divorce agreement signed by the two stated that “Both parties agree that before our youngest child turns 21, Wujiang will be my sole In the residence of the three children, Mr. Wang is not allowed to enter the residence without my consent except for the agreed visiting time. The two sides have agreed on the visiting time, and all visitors other than Mr. Wang can only come with the prior consent of both parties.”

In addition, she also raised three major questions: I would like to ask the ‘our firm’ also suggested that Mr. Wang violated the agreement in our agreement, brought in people who have not yet agreed to visit, and even concealed a person I never met, and you never paid I didn’t mention, did the man who was deliberately hidden appear?”, “May I ask if the firm also suggested that Mr. Wang ignore me and express clearly that his behaviors and requests made me feel threatened and have security concerns, and I can still be strong in the absence of legal procedures. With consent, they attempted to invade the house with three men, causing the children to be frightened.” “Is it possible that the ‘office’ took money to write this without even knowing the objective facts. letter? “Return to Sohu, see more

Editor:

Disclaimer: The opinions of this article only represent the author himself, Sohu is an information publishing platform, and Sohu only provides information storage space services.

.

0 comment
0

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Privacy & Cookies Policy