Home » Zeng Shunxi’s contract termination case won the first-instance court ruling to terminate the contract with Black Gold Company_Plaintiff_Zeng Wei_Counterclaim

Zeng Shunxi’s contract termination case won the first-instance court ruling to terminate the contract with Black Gold Company_Plaintiff_Zeng Wei_Counterclaim

by admin

Original title: Zeng Shunxi’s contract termination case was decided by the court of first instance to terminate the contract with Heijin Company

Zeng Shunxi

Sohu Entertainment News recently, Tianyancha App showed that Zeng Weihang and Beijing Heifang Jinyuan Culture Media Co., Ltd. contract dispute documents were published.

According to the document, the plaintiff Zeng Weihang (Zeng Shunxi) alleged that, during the performance of the contract with Heijin Company, Heijin Company had not paid him a share of performance income for a long time, and was negligent in fulfilling the contract obligations, which hindered the development of the plaintiff’s performing arts business. It requested an order to confirm that the “Artist Contract” signed with Heijin Company and the two supplementary agreements were terminated on February 18, 2021; Heijin Company shall pay him all the unpaid performing arts revenue share of 15 million yuan.

Heijin Company argued that Heijin Company did not owe any share to the plaintiff, and the allegations affecting the plaintiff’s performing arts work had no factual or legal basis. In addition, Heijin Company paid the plaintiff’s personal income tax and late payment totaling more than 4.95 million yuan in November 2018, which should be returned by the plaintiff. In summary, Heijin Company filed a counterclaim, demanding that the plaintiff should return to Heijin Company the excess of 16.64 million yuan of income share and the personal income tax and late fees paid on its behalf.

The court found that Heijin Company’s delay in paying the share of revenue may have failed to perform the statutory termination of the contract within a reasonable period of time after being urged, so the plaintiff has the right to terminate the contract in accordance with the law. The counterclaim request of Heijin Company to request the plaintiff to return the personal income tax and late fee paid on his behalf is not supported.

See also  2022/8/27 - Oaks sits down to get deep with Sydney based emcee Sole Option

The judgment of this case confirmed that the “Agreement” and the two “Supplementary Agreements” signed by Zeng Weihang and Heijin Company were terminated on February 18, 2021, and Heijin Company paid 15 million yuan in revenue share to Zeng Weihang and rejected its counterclaim.Return to Sohu to see more

Editor:

Disclaimer: The opinions of this article only represent the author himself. Sohu is an information publishing platform. Sohu only provides information storage space services.

.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Privacy & Cookies Policy