Well. It means that the Florentine varnish was successful, with a double meaning:
– the environmental alarm is underestimated
– remediation policies are insufficient.
If there hadn’t been paint, would we be here today talking about it?
Not only that, but the institutional representatives (Municipality of Florence and the Region of Tuscany), beyond the declarations on their environmental commitment, what are they doing more and better and, given the dramatic situation, radical about it?
We acknowledge that everyone is an environmentalist and that their programs and actions include many environmental protection initiatives, but these representatives of ours have not asked themselves a question: is what we are doing sufficient and right? A question that they haven’t asked themselves despite the deterioration and the damages are growing dramatically, despite their initiatives and their pronouncements on the matter being daily.
It is here that the varnish of today’s environmentalists plays an important role: it has exposed those who have responsibilities and do not use them efficiently and decisively.
This is why the painting in via Cavour in Florence (and all the others in the world) is not to be condemned, but to be thanked.
At this point it is a question of understanding and verifying whether our institutional representatives will limit themselves to thanking the forces of order for having stopped the painters or will follow up on what they acknowledge they are doing too little.
At the juncture, paints are welcome, They’re like coffee in the morning.
the association does not receives and is against public funding (also 5 per thousand)
Its economic strength are inscriptions and contributions donated by those who deem it useful
DONATE NOW