Home » Agreement on debt in the US undergoes a litmus test in Congress

Agreement on debt in the US undergoes a litmus test in Congress

by admin
Agreement on debt in the US undergoes a litmus test in Congress

The agreement that seeks to increase the borrowing capacity of the United States to avoid a default, achieved after marathon negotiations between President Joe Biden and the Republicans, arrives this Wednesday at the House of Representatives for a vote that is expected to be stormy.

Congress has a few days to spare before the country’s treasury begins to falter, which will happen as of June 5, according to an estimate by Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen.

The terms of the agreement reached between Biden and the Republican leader of the House of Representatives, Kevin McCarthy, still require the approval of lawmakers, some of them fierce opponents of the initiative.

The United States risks a default or cessation of payments on its obligations, something unprecedented that can have catastrophic consequences for the economy.

On Tuesday, the House Rules Committee gave a first indication of the expected trend in voting on the bill, seven votes to six, with two Republicans and four Democrats against.

Now it is up to the congressmen of the House of Representatives, with a Republican majority, to rule on Wednesday’s vote scheduled in plenary session before the Senate, with a Democratic majority.

The head of the Republican camp in the chamber, Kevin McCarthy, acknowledged that he will not achieve unanimity, but was optimistic of reaching the “biggest” budget cuts in history, he told reporters.

“Speaker” McCarthy still has a tough task ahead: convincing the Republican majority to adopt the new law so that it does not appear to depend on Democratic representatives.

On their side, the Democratic leaders, despite the cuts to the government budget, promised to contribute the votes that would be missing.

See also  Historic U19 triple! Golden age and soon to be a professional coach?

House Democrats will vote “not to default the country. Period,” declared their boss, Hakeem Jeffries.

Joe Biden, who visits Colorado on Wednesday night, wanted the text to pass the first vote before his arrival in that western state. On Tuesday he had “firmly” called on lawmakers to sign it into law.

“Let’s keep moving forward in meeting our obligations and build the most powerful economy in human history,” the president said on Twitter.



“bad deal”

Nancy Mace, a Republican congresswoman for the state of South Carolina, said Tuesday on Twitter that she will not vote in favor of the text.

“This ‘agreement’ formalizes the expected record level of federal spending during the pandemic and makes it the baseline for future spending,” Mace criticized.

Chip Roy, a Texas congressman from the Republican wing that supports former President Donald Trump, called it a “bad deal” that “no Republican should vote for.”

“We are going to continue the fight today and tomorrow no matter what happens,” Roy said.

Some Republicans are even considering a vote of no confidence to force Kevin McCarthy to resign as Speaker of the House.

On the Democratic side, some are also skeptical. Rep. Ro Khanna, of California, said several of his colleagues oppose the budget cuts and “don’t know yet” how they’re going to vote.

The bill suspends the debt ceiling until 2025, long enough to get through the next 2024 presidential election.

In exchange, some expenses are limited in order to keep them stable -except the military- in 2024 and limit their increase to 1% by 2025.

See also  ELN retained Pastor Alape's bodyguards in Arauca and stole their weapons – news

It also provides for a reduction of 10,000 million dollars in the funds assigned to the treasury to modernize and intensify controls.

McCarthy’s office further explained that the agreement provides for the recovery of “billions of dollars of covid funds that were not spent” on the pandemic, without giving further details.

One of the points of contention includes modifications to the conditions to benefit from some social assistance, such as the increase in the working age from 49 to 54 years for adults without children who aspire to food assistance, but eliminates this requirement for veterans of war and homeless

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Privacy & Cookies Policy